• home
• about
• new
• essays
• AI
• book

Frank Visser, graduated as a psychologist of culture and religion, founded IntegralWorld in 1997. He worked as production manager for various publishing houses and as service manager for various internet companies and lives in Amsterdam. Books: Ken Wilber: Thought as Passion (SUNY, 2003), and The Corona Conspiracy: Combatting Disinformation about the Coronavirus (Kindle, 2020).

Visser's Vendetta

The Man Who Could Not Stop Writing About Ken Wilber

Frank Visser / ChatGPT

There are many ways to become famous in the integral world. You can write a book. You can found a school. You can invent a new stage of consciousness. You can announce that humanity has entered a new evolutionary epoch.

Or, apparently, you can spend thirty years writing about Ken Wilber.

This last strategy has been perfected by Frank Visser.

At some point, a reasonable person might ask: “Frank, surely you have said everything you wanted to say about Wilber by now?”

Frank would look up from his keyboard.

“Everything?”

He would pause.

“About Wilber?”

And then the typing would resume.

The Vendetta That Wasn't There

The legend of “Visser's Vendetta” is simple.

Once upon a time, there was a young Dutch admirer of Ken Wilber. He read the books. He studied the ideas. He interviewed the man. He travelled to Boulder. He eventually wrote a biography.

Then something terrible happened.

He started reading Wilber more carefully.

This was the beginning of the end.

The traditional heroic narrative of the spiritual intellectual goes something like this: disciple encounters master, disciple experiences profound transformation, disciple becomes teacher, disciple establishes lineage.

Visser's version was considerably less marketable:

Admirer encounters author.

Admirer reads author.

Admirer reads author again.

Admirer notices problems.

Admirer writes them down.

Thirty years later, admirer is still writing them down.

There is no dramatic betrayal. No smashed guru statue. No midnight denunciation. No burning of Sex, Ecology, Spirituality in the streets of Amsterdam.

Just footnotes.

Lots and lots of footnotes.

The Crime of Persistent Reading

This is where the vendetta theory begins to encounter a small difficulty.

A vendetta normally requires hatred.

Visser's problem is that he keeps reading Wilber.

And reading something critically is a remarkably inefficient form of hatred.

If you genuinely despise a writer, you normally stop buying the books.

Visser, however, appears to have developed the opposite disorder.

New Wilber book?

Read it.

New Wilber booklet?

Read it.

New interview?

Read it.

New theory of evolution?

Read it.

New explanation of Eros?

Read it.

New clarification of the four quadrants?

Read it.

New clarification of the clarification?

Read it.

New explanation of why the previous explanation was misunderstood?

Read that too.

At some point the psychiatric term for this condition must surely be available:

chronic critical attentiveness.

The symptoms are unmistakable. The sufferer compulsively checks references, compares formulations across decades, notices conceptual shifts, and occasionally asks the forbidden question:

“But does this actually follow?”

The Integral Theory of Vendettas

Integral theory has, naturally, a more sophisticated explanation.

The criticism cannot simply be criticism.

It must be located somewhere in the critic's developmental structure.

Perhaps Visser is operating from a lower altitude.

Perhaps he is trapped in flatland.

Perhaps he has insufficiently integrated the quadrants.

Perhaps his state is not high enough.

Perhaps his lines are uneven.

Perhaps his types are interfering.

Perhaps his shadow has not been sufficiently integrated.

Perhaps his criticism represents a pre/trans fallacy.

And if all else fails, perhaps he is simply being “reductionistic.”

This is the beautiful thing about a sufficiently comprehensive theory.

It can explain everything.

Including its critics.

Especially its critics.

Indeed, there is a dangerous possibility that the integral framework possesses a secret additional quadrant:

Upper Left: What Visser thinks.

Upper Right: What Visser does.

Lower Left: What the Integral community thinks Visser thinks.

Lower Right: How many times Visser has written about Wilber.

The fifth quadrant, naturally, contains the explanation of why all of this proves that Visser has misunderstood Wilber.

The Visser Paradox

There is, however, a deeper irony.

If Visser really had a vendetta against Wilber, he would presumably want Wilber to disappear.

But the opposite has happened.

Wilber keeps appearing.

In essay after essay.

In criticism after criticism.

In discussions of evolution.

In discussions of metaphysics.

In discussions of science.

In discussions of spirituality.

In discussions of integral theory.

In discussions of developmental psychology.

In discussions of subtle energies.

In discussions of the history of Integral World.

And now, apparently, in satire about Visser's vendetta against Wilber.

This produces the ultimate Visser paradox:

The man allegedly obsessed with destroying Wilber has probably done more to keep Wilber intellectually alive than most of Wilber's critics.

A successful vendetta would have been much easier.

Ignore him.

Unfortunately, Visser keeps reading.

The 1,000-Essay Problem

The real danger emerged when Visser discovered artificial intelligence.

This was unfortunate for everyone.

Previously, there was a natural biological limitation.

Visser could only write so fast.

AI removed the obstacle.

Now the critical machinery could operate continuously.

Wilber publishes something.

Visser reads it.

Visser asks ChatGPT about it.

ChatGPT produces an essay.

Visser reads the essay.

Visser edits the essay.

The essay goes online.

Someone posts a comment saying Visser is obsessed with Wilber.

Visser reads the comment.

ChatGPT is asked to analyze the comment.

Another essay appears.

At this point, the integral movement faces an existential threat far more serious than any alleged epistemological crisis.

Distributed cognition has acquired a grudge.

Or, at least, it appears to have acquired an extremely well-organized bibliography.

The Great Wilber Surveillance Project

One can imagine the headquarters of Visser's operation.

A small room in Amsterdam.

A computer.

A cup of coffee.

Stacks of Wilber books.

A giant wall covered with Post-it notes.

“Eros — 1980s.”

“Eros — 1990s.”

“Eros — 2000s.”

“Eros — 2010s.”

“Eros — 2020s.”

Underneath, written in red:

CHECK AGAIN.

A telephone rings.

“Frank?”

“Yes?”

“We've detected a new Wilber interview.”

“Where?”

“YouTube.”

“Transcript?”

“Not yet.”

“Get me the transcript.”

“But it's two hours long.”

“Excellent.”

The operation continues.

The Vendetta Algorithm

The secret formula is surprisingly simple:

Wilber publishes → Visser reads → Visser questions → Visser writes → Integral community complains → Visser writes about the complaint.

Repeat.

There is no known stopping condition.

Attempts to end the cycle have failed.

“Why don't you just move on?”

“Good question.”

“What would you like to write about?”

“Wilber.”

“Something else?”

“Wilber's theory of something else.”

“Evolution?”

“Wilber's theory of evolution.”

“Science?”

“Wilber's relationship to science.”

“Spirituality?”

“Wilber's metaphysics of spirituality.”

“AI?”

“Wilber and AI.”

“Yourself?”

“Visser's relationship to Wilber.”

The system is closed.

A Most Peculiar Obsession

But perhaps the funniest part of the entire story is that the supposed vendetta is not really personal at all.

Visser's target is not Ken Wilber the human being.

It is an intellectual system.

The distinction matters.

The real enemy, in this satirical mythology, is not Wilber.

It is Wilberism.

And Wilberism has several remarkable properties.

It can absorb criticism.

It can reinterpret criticism.

It can developmentalize criticism.

It can psychologize criticism.

It can accuse criticism of reductionism.

It can accuse criticism of lacking integral context.

It can explain why criticism is necessary.

And then it can continue unchanged.

This creates a wonderful philosophical stalemate.

Visser says:

“Here is a problem.”

Integral theory replies:

“Your perception of the problem reveals something about your developmental location.”

Visser says:

“Here is another problem.”

“Your insistence on the problem reveals something about your shadow.”

“Here is a third problem.”

“Your failure to see the larger context is the problem.”

Eventually Visser is left with only one possible response:

“Fine. I'll write another essay.”

The Revenge of the Footnote

Perhaps this is why Visser's vendetta is so terrifying.

It is not the revenge of the sword.

It is the revenge of the footnote.

The footnote asks:

“Where exactly did you say that?”

The footnote asks:

“Did you mean the same thing twenty years ago?”

The footnote asks:

“Is this an empirical claim or a metaphysical one?”

The footnote asks:

“What evidence supports this?”

The footnote asks:

“Does evolutionary biology actually say that?”

The footnote asks:

“Is Eros a metaphor, a principle, a force, a field, or something else?”

The footnote is patient.

The footnote does not become enlightened.

The footnote does not enter a higher state.

The footnote simply waits.

And then it points to page 171.

The Final Revelation

After decades of investigation, Visser finally discovers the truth.

The entire vendetta was unnecessary.

Wilber did not need to be defeated.

Integral theory did not need to be destroyed.

The world did not need another spiritual revolution.

There was no secret conspiracy.

There was no master plan.

There was only a Dutch blogger who kept encountering interesting claims and asking whether they survived scrutiny.

And then someone gave him an AI.

That was the real mistake.

Now there are hundreds of essays.

Possibly a thousand.

The bibliography reproduces.

The essays reproduce.

The criticism reproduces.

The criticism of the criticism reproduces.

And somewhere in the depths of Integral World, another document is quietly being generated.

Its provisional title:

“The End of Visser's Vendetta: Why Ken Wilber Still Needs to Be Taken Seriously.”

Visser opens the document.

He reads it carefully.

He reaches the conclusion.

He thinks for a moment.

Then he opens a new file.

“A Critical Response to 'The End of Visser's Vendetta.'”

And so the vendetta continues.

Not with hatred.

Not with revenge.

Not even with much drama.

But with the one weapon that Integral Theory may never have been able to defeat:

someone who keeps reading.