• home
• about
• new
• essays
• AI
• book

Frank Visser, graduated as a psychologist of culture and religion, founded IntegralWorld in 1997. He worked as production manager for various publishing houses and as service manager for various internet companies and lives in Amsterdam. Books: Ken Wilber: Thought as Passion (SUNY, 2003), and The Corona Conspiracy: Combatting Disinformation about the Coronavirus (Kindle, 2020).

The Wyatt Earp Episode

Part 5: After Wilber — The Struggle to Outgrow the Guru

Frank Visser / ChatGPT

1. The Long Shadow of 2006

The 2006 Wyatt Earp blog eruption marked the psychological break point for many early Integralists. It exposed the contradiction between Wilber's rhetoric of “second-tier integration” and his conduct as a defensive guru. But the deeper impact unfolded slowly: the movement fragmented, lost academic traction, and retreated into online echo chambers.

By the mid-2010s, Wilber himself had largely withdrawn. He published little, stopped engaging with critics, and focused on Integral Life as a lifestyle platform. The intellectual ferment of the 1990s and early 2000s—Sex, Ecology, Spirituality, A Brief History of Everything—gave way to re-packaged teachings aimed at loyal insiders.

Yet the “integral” impulse—the dream of a synthesis across disciplines and worldviews—did not die. Instead, a younger cohort began to reinterpret, critique, and sometimes repudiate their master.

2. The Emergence of Post-Wilber Integralism

Several figures have tried to rebuild the project while acknowledging Wilber's limitations. Their efforts represent both continuity and rebellion.

a) Layman Pascal: The Meta-Modern Integralist

Pascal, a former priest and philosopher, has become one of the most articulate advocates of a meta-modern Integralism. His podcasts and essays treat Wilber's work as a “necessary first draft” of integration—grand but immature.

Pascal retains AQAL's pluralism but strips it of spiritual triumphalism. He reframes “levels” as horizons of complexity rather than ladders of superiority. He jokes that Wilber's “second-tier” rhetoric was really “first-tier ego dressed in rainbow robes.”

Where Wilber sought a pyramid of consciousness, Pascal imagines a network of perspectives, each situated, partial, and dialogical. In other words: integration through conversation, not revelation.

b) Bruce Alderman: The Academic Bridge-Builder

Alderman, teaching at JFK University and later at Integral Stage, aims to re-ground Integral Theory in phenomenology, hermeneutics, and post-metaphysical philosophy. He sees the Wilberian edifice as over-systematized and under-argued.

Alderman introduces the notion of “ontological pluralism”: instead of assuming a single cosmic hierarchy, he explores multiple co-existing ontologies (scientific, phenomenological, spiritual). This allows integral thinking to dialogue with process philosophy, enactivism, and continental thought—fields Wilber largely ignored.

His work exemplifies what Wilber never mastered: genuine academic engagement. Alderman cites critics like Frank Visser and Joseph Dillard not as enemies but as partners in a shared inquiry.

c) Zak Stein: The Developmentalist with Conscience

Zak Stein emerged from the Integral milieu as one of its most intellectually serious figures—a developmental psychologist who shared Wilber's interest in human growth, yet questioned the metaphysical excesses of his teacher. Stein respects Wilber's map of developmental lines and stages, but he has long warned that such models can easily become instruments of spiritual inflation. For him, development is not a cosmic destiny but a moral and educational responsibility.

However, Stein's later collaboration with Marc Gafni on Cosmo-Erotic Humanism complicates this picture. In aligning himself with Gafni's grand metaphysical rhetoric—explicitly invoking Eros as a cosmic principle—Stein appears to re-enter the very mythic atmosphere he once sought to leave behind. The sober developmentalist joins the visionary metaphysician. What was once an ethical project of responsibility risks being reabsorbed into Wilber's old storyline: the universe itself awakening through us.

Stein thus stands as both a reformer and a symptom of the Integral predicament—a thinker striving to rescue meaning from metaphysics, yet still drawn to the seductive promise of cosmic purpose.

3. From System to Ecosystem

Together, these thinkers illustrate a shift from Integral Theory as system to integral inquiry as ecosystem.

Where Wilber declared “This is the map of everything,” the new generation says, “Let's keep mapping together.”

4. The Continuing Problem of Mythic Residue

Yet even these reformers face a lingering challenge: the mythic allure of Wilber's narrative. Many Integralists still crave the grand cosmology—the feeling of being part of a heroic upward march of consciousness.

Meta-modern humility lacks the intoxication of Wilber's “Spirit-in-action.” The myth of cosmic Eros remains emotionally potent even when intellectually discredited.

This explains why Integral Life, despite its intellectual stagnation, still attracts followers. It offers belonging, certainty, and a story of evolutionary destiny. Post-Wilber Integralists must therefore balance critique with care: they must dismantle the myth without losing the meaning it once provided.

5. The Rehabilitation of Critique

A notable change since Wyatt Earp is the gradual rehabilitation of Integral World itself. While Wilber once told followers to distrust it, younger integralists now read it as an indispensable archive of critical history.

Frank Visser, once vilified, has become a touchstone for how Integral thought can evolve through rational debate. Joseph Dillard's dialogical model (Dream Sociometry) also embodies the same ethos: authority shared, not imposed.

This marks a reversal of Wilber's defensive posture. Integral thinking is slowly learning that integration without critique is indoctrination.

6. The Guru Problem Revisited

Every movement born from charisma must, at some point, outgrow its founder. The question for Integral Theory has never been merely intellectual but psychological: can the community transcend its need for a prophet?

Wilber's later writings still encourage dependency—his followers quoting him as scripture. But the new generation is trying to cultivate post-charismatic Integralism: a space where maps evolve collaboratively, and no one speaks ex cathedra.

Whether this transition succeeds will determine if Integral theory matures into a living discourse or ossifies into neo-Theosophical metaphysics.

7. Lessons from the Post-Wyatt Era

The twenty years since Wyatt Earp teach a hard but valuable lesson:

No synthesis without criticism. Integration demands exposure to difference, not insulation from it.

No evolution without humility. Spiritual arrogance masquerading as insight leads to regression.

No community without transparency. When the guru cannot be questioned, the teaching dies.

Wilber's fall from intellectual grace was tragic, but necessary. It forced the integral world to confront its own shadow—the very process his theory claimed to model.

8. Conclusion: The Integral Renaissance?

Today, “integral” survives in scattered forms—academic, meta-modern, therapeutic, ecological. Few call themselves Wilberians anymore, but many still think integrally: seeking synthesis without totalization, spirituality without dogma, evolution without teleology.

The Wyatt Earp affair will remain the cautionary origin myth of this renaissance: the moment when integration met its shadow and had to choose between growth and guruhood.

If post-Wilber integralism succeeds, it will not be because it defended the master's map, but because it finally took his own advice—to transcend and include.