• home
• about
• new
• essays
• AI
• book

Frank Visser, graduated as a psychologist of culture and religion, founded IntegralWorld in 1997. He worked as production manager for various publishing houses and as service manager for various internet companies and lives in Amsterdam. Books: Ken Wilber: Thought as Passion (SUNY, 2003), and The Corona Conspiracy: Combatting Disinformation about the Coronavirus (Kindle, 2020).

Cosmic Teleology in Disguise

A Critical Examination of Bobby Azarian's "Theory of Everything"

Frank Visser / ChatGPT

Bobby Azarian's proposed “Theory of Everything”[1] arrives dressed in the language of physics, information theory, and complexity science. His symbolic schema — ψ, Φ, Ω, A, C — suggests precision, rigor, and mathematical grounding. His equations evoke quantum theory, thermodynamics, and Bayesian selection dynamics. At first glance, one might assume this framework is a bold extension of contemporary science: a unifying synthesis linking quantum mechanics, cosmology, evolution, and consciousness.

But appearances deceive.

A closer examination reveals that what Azarian presents is not a scientific theory in the empirical sense, but a metaphysical system cloaked in scientific notation — a modernization of Teilhard's Omega Point theology, refurbished through the vocabulary of complexity science and cognitive systems theory. His proposal does not extend physics; it imports teleology into physics by symbolic sleight of hand.

The result is not a “Theory of Everything,” but an expression of cosmic idealism disguised as physics.

The Core Move: Teleology Slipped Into the Hamiltonian

Azarian's framework hinges on the modification of the Schrödinger equation:

iℏψ˙​=(H₀​+Hd​+Ha​)ψ

Two terms have physical legitimacy:

H₀ — the standard Hamiltonian that governs quantum evolution.

H_d — a dissipative or environmental coupling term used in open quantum systems.

But the decisive insertion is Hₐ,, which is interpreted as an attractor or teleological operator. No such term exists in quantum theory. No evidence demands its inclusion. No experiment indicates its necessity. No mathematical derivation motivates it.

It exists for one purpose only:

To encode a metaphysical assumption — that evolution is directional and purposeful — into the mathematics.

Equation first, justification later.

This is not theoretical physics; it is equation laundering — the practice of expressing metaphysical beliefs through symbols to give them the appearance of scientific legitimacy.

The Born Rule Modified into a Selection Narrative

Azarian further alters quantum mechanics through a modified probability rule:

P(n)=∣⟨n∣ψ⟩∣²e^−Δ/k

Here the exponential penalty term is interpreted as a bias toward energy-efficient or information-rich structures. But again:

• There is no empirical evidence that nature weights quantum outcomes this way.
• The modification explains no anomaly in quantum experiments.
• It predicts no measurable deviation from the standard Born rule.

Instead, this term is inserted to retroactively justify a story: that physical systems are biased toward complexity, intelligence, and consciousness.

In legitimate physics, new equations either explain unexplained data or predict new phenomena. Azarian's modifications do neither. They function decoratively — conceptually ornamental rather than empirically necessary.

Entropy, Information, and the Teleology Gap

Azarian employs a thermodynamic relation:

dt/dS​=σ˙−∑Φi​

This resembles equations in non-equilibrium thermodynamics, where systems can locally reduce entropy by exporting it to the environment. Such processes underlie cell metabolism, weather systems, crystals, and convection patterns.

But Azarian extends this to claim that:

Information stored in emergent structures implies that the universe trends toward intelligence and consciousness.

This is precisely the logical leap complexity scientists repeatedly warn against: the conflation of local self-organization with universal teleology. Complex patterns arise when energy flows maintain systems away from equilibrium — not because the universe wants complexity.

Nothing in the mathematics licenses the leap from:

self-organization exists

to

self-organization aims at consciousness.

Evolution Is Not Trending Toward Intelligence

Azarian's theory depends on a strong global claim:

The universe is evolving toward increasing complexity, cognition, and ultimately cosmic self-awareness.

But evolution is not a ladder, a staircase, or a cosmic ascent. It is a branching, contingent, massively wasteful experiment. Most of biological history is bacterial. Most lineages simplify. Intelligence is rare, fragile, and non-inevitable.

There is no statistical signal that complexity is the destiny of matter — only that under certain rare conditions, complexity can arise.

Evolution is not a pilgrimage; it is a tangle.

The Return of Omega

Once the symbolic mist evaporates, Azarian's framework is revealed as a modern expression of a familiar metaphysical arc:

• Matter evolves into life.
• Life evolves into mind.
• Mind evolves into cosmic self-recognition.

It is Teilhard de Chardin reformulated via quantum notation. Wilberian Eros rewritten using Hamiltonians. Whitehead's process metaphysics reframed as informational optimization.

Such frameworks may be intellectually imaginative, existentially appealing, or spiritually meaningful — but they do not meet the standards of empirical science.

A scientific Theory of Everything must:

• Be testable.
• Be falsifiable.
• Make novel predictions.
• Reduce metaphysical assumptions.

Azarian's system does none of these. Instead, it assumes what it claims to explain: teleology.

Conclusion: Science or Storytelling?

Azarian's Theory of Everything is not physics extended — it is physics appropriated. The mathematics does not drive the metaphysics; the metaphysics drives the mathematics. The appeal lies not in its explanatory rigor, but in its narrative promise: that the universe is meaningful, directional, and ultimately conscious.

But science is not obliged to console us.

The real universe may be indifferent to our preferences for spiritual coherence or cosmic purpose. Complexity may be an accident, consciousness a local curiosity, and teleology a projection of the human mind onto a cosmos that evolved without needing intention.

Azarian offers a poetic cosmology, not a scientific theory.

And if the lesson of the last century of physics is clear, it is this:

Not all elegance is truth, and not all meaning requires metaphysics.

NOTES

[1] Bobby Azarian, "Project Omega Begins: The Theory, the Cipher, and the Challenge", roadtoomega.substack.com, Nov 17, 2025.