• home
• about
• new
• essays
• AI
• book

Frank Visser, graduated as a psychologist of culture and religion, founded IntegralWorld in 1997. He worked as production manager for various publishing houses and as service manager for various internet companies and lives in Amsterdam. Books: Ken Wilber: Thought as Passion (SUNY, 2003), and The Corona Conspiracy: Combatting Disinformation about the Coronavirus (Kindle, 2020).

The Mythic Rehabilitation of Astrology

Frank Visser / Grok

For centuries astrology has lingered in a strange twilight between science and symbol. Dismissed by scientists as superstition, yet kept alive by believers as a subtle “language of the soul,” it refuses to die. Its defenders have shifted strategies over time, from causal explanations (“the planets influence us”) to symbolic or synchronistic ones (“the heavens mirror what happens below”). The Integral community has not been immune to this fascination. From Alejandro Christian Luna's early essay “Astrology: from quantum physics to spirituality, Different assumptions of how Astrology works” to Richard Tarnas's monumental Cosmos and Psyche, and Joe Corbett's essays on “quantum-archetypal” cosmology, we see an ongoing attempt to give astrology a metaphysical facelift without ever confronting its empirical failures.

From Causation to Correlation

Luna's 2015 essay on Integral World represents astrology's first line of defense within a Wilberian context.[1] He proposed that astrological correlations might emerge through subtle “morphogenetic” or “acausal” fields linking mind and cosmos. Although couched in quasi-scientific language, his approach left untouched the central issue: if planetary positions genuinely shape our psychology, why are birth charts indistinguishable from chance when tested? The argument collapses under even modest statistical scrutiny, as Michel Gauquelin's decades of research ultimately showed.

Yet Luna's essay is revealing in another way. It marks astrology's migration from a physical to a metaphysical register. No longer an empirical hypothesis, it becomes an expression of “holistic resonance”—a rhetorical pivot that would prove decisive for its survival in integral circles.

Tarnas and the Archetypal Turn

Richard Tarnas radicalized this symbolic shift. In Cosmos and Psyche (2006), he abandoned the individual horoscope altogether and focused instead on historical cycles and planetary alignments.[2] His claim was that world events follow meaningful archetypal patterns that correspond with the configurations of the outer planets. Crucially, Tarnas avoided the entire issue of the zodiacal constellations, since these have shifted one sign due to precession—a fact fatal to naïve astrological claims. Instead, he reframed astrology as a study of meaningful coincidences, Jung's “synchronicities” on a collective scale.

Tarnas's prose is stirring, his research erudite, but his method remains opaque. Correlations are established after the fact, patterns discerned in hindsight. The approach is immune to falsification because no precise predictions are made in advance. Tarnas thus gives astrology an intellectual afterlife—not as science, but as archetypal historiography.

Corbett's Quantum Metaphysics

Joe Corbett carries this move to its metaphysical extreme. In his “integral astrology,” planets, archetypes, and psyches are not causally related but “quantum-archetypally entangled” in the implicate order of reality.[3] The planets serve as “cosmic mirrors” of our own inner dynamics. Astrology, tarot, and the I-Ching are seen as “quantum technologies of the self,” allowing consciousness to interface with the archetypal matrix of the universe.

This is an impressive imaginative synthesis, but one that abandons any pretense of testability. The language of quantum physics is invoked symbolically, not empirically. There are no measurable effects, no reproducible outcomes, only resonances discernible to the believer. The result is metaphysical poetry dressed in scientific metaphors—an elaborate mythology of participation between psyche and cosmos.

Corbett's system is therefore not a rehabilitation of astrology, but its sublimation. What was once a set of celestial measurements has become a map of transpersonal meaning. The stars are no longer agents or indicators, but metaphors of interior states projected onto the heavens.

From Science to Symbol—and Beyond

What we see across these three stages is not the rescue of astrology, but its gradual retreat from the empirical world. Each defender concedes a little more ground to science, until finally the entire enterprise exists only on the level of metaphor. Yet the attraction remains: astrology offers a narrative of participation in a disenchanted cosmos. It provides a psychological and mythic coherence that modernity lacks.

Perhaps that is its enduring function—not as a predictive tool, but as a poetic language for meaning-making. It gives voice to the longing that “as above, so below”—that our lives are not random but somehow woven into a cosmic story. That desire is real and powerful. But we should be honest about what it is: not discovery, but desire; not knowledge, but myth.

Astrology, in its integral reincarnations, tells us less about the heavens than about ourselves—our refusal to live in a universe that is silent, indifferent, and vast.

The Integral Context

From the perspective of Integral Theory, this distinction is crucial. Astrology can be understood through several developmental lenses.

In its prerational or magical form, characteristic of early cultures, the planets and stars are thought to cause events on Earth through invisible forces—a literal “as above, so below.” This is astrology as cosmic machinery, where celestial objects directly govern human affairs.

The mythic level reinterprets these forces as divine agents or archetypal dramas—gods in the sky acting out moral and spiritual lessons mirrored on Earth. Here astrology becomes narrative and moral rather than mechanical, but still retains a belief in cosmic intentionality.

The rational stage, which emerged with the scientific revolution, demands evidence, precision, and causal clarity. It exposes astrology's empirical weaknesses and dissolves its literal claims under the light of probability and control experiments. At this level, astrology collapses as a science—but survives as a cultural artifact or psychological projection.

Finally, the transrational or intuitive interpretation seeks to recover astrology's symbolic value without its premodern metaphysics. Here, planetary alignments become mirrors of inner experience, synchronistic expressions of meaning rather than physical causes. This approach can be legitimate as long as it is understood metaphorically—as a language of psyche and cosmos, not a mechanism of celestial influence.

Wilber's AQAL framework clarifies these boundaries. Astrology may hold subjective or symbolic truth within the Upper-Left quadrant of meaning and experience, but it has no standing in the Upper-Right or Lower-Right domains of objective or systemic causality. To confuse these orders—to treat metaphor as mechanism, or intuition as data—is precisely the pre/trans fallacy Integral Theory warns against.

If astrology has any place in an integral framework, it must be as art and symbol, not as science and system—a poetic mirror of consciousness rather than a predictive map of the cosmos.

NOTES

[1] Alejandro Christian Luna, "Astrology: from quantum physics to spirituality, Different assumptions of how Astrology works", www.integralworld.net, April 2015.

[2] Richard Tarnas, Cosmos and Psyche: Intimations of a New Worldview, Plume, 2006.

[3] Joe Corbett, "The Quantum-Archetypal Technologies of Astrology, Tarot, and the I-Ching", August 2011; and "Archetypal Astrology and the Kosmic Holomovement", October 2017