TRANSLATE THIS ARTICLE
Integral World: Exploring Theories of Everything
An independent forum for a critical discussion of the integral philosophy of Ken Wilber
![]() ![]()
Check out my conversations with ChatGPT NEW: AI-generated podcasts using NotebookLM The Macrohistory of Futurist Lawrence TaubFrank Visser / ChatGPT
![]() Me to ChatGPT:
What can you tell me about futurist Lawrence Taub?Lawrence Taub (1936-2018) was an American futurist renowned for his macrohistorical analyses and forward-looking predictions. Born in Newark, New Jersey, he earned a B.A. in History from New York University, graduating summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa, with minors in Political Science and French. He began studies at Harvard Law School but chose to pursue a certificate to teach French at the Sorbonne in Paris instead. ![]() Lawrence Taub Throughout his life, Taub resided in various countries, including France, Denmark, Sweden, Israel, India, Nepal, Germany, and Australia. He eventually settled in Tokyo, where he lived for 23 of the last 31 years of his life. In Tokyo, he worked as an ESL instructor, freelance translator, and narrator of commercial films. He was proficient in ten languages to varying degrees. Taub gained attention in Japan during the 1970s for his lectures and predictions about global developments. He notably forecasted events such as the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Islamic Revolution in Iran, and the rise of China and its Confucian counterparts as leading economic powers by 2020. His seminal work, "The Spiritual Imperative: Sex, Age, and The Last Caste," introduces three models designed to help readers anticipate global future trends. The book has been translated into Japanese, Korean, and Spanish. In 2013, the Japanese edition reached the number one spot on the Japanese bestsellers list. Economist Masanori Kanda described Taub as combining the insights of Alvin Toffler, Peter Drucker, and John Kenneth Galbraith. In the early 1970s, Taub collaborated with Sawako Takagi, a co-founder of the Japanese radical feminist movement, on Femintern Press, a feminist publishing project. He later co-authored "Multinational Sex," one of the first books exposing the intricacies of sex tourism. Taub's work presents his macrohistorical discoveries and predicts future trends based on them. He published articles on the subject, presented related papers at conferences, and was interviewed on radio and television. He was a member of the World Futures Studies Federation since 1997. For those interested in exploring his ideas further, a recent publication titled "A Futurist for the 21st Century: The Macrohistory of Lawrence Taub (1936-2018)" delves into his life and work. Describe his model of macrohistory in more detail.Lawrence Taub's macrohistorical model is a framework that examines large-scale historical patterns and trends to make predictions about societal, cultural, and economic developments. His work integrates elements of philosophy, history, sociology, and systems theory to identify recurring dynamics in human civilizations. Below are the key aspects of his model, as presented in his book The Spiritual Imperative: Sex, Age, and the Last Caste: Three Core Macrohistorical ModelsTaub's work incorporates three interrelated models that together offer a holistic perspective on historical and future trends: The Age-Caste ModelThis model views history as a progression of dominant "ages" or "castes," with each age representing a distinct societal structure and value system. Taub posits that civilizations move through stages dominated by different archetypes: Warriors: Societies governed by physical power and territorial conquest (e.g., feudal Japan, medieval Europe). Priests: Societies shaped by religious or spiritual authority (e.g., theocratic empires such as ancient Egypt). Merchants: Societies driven by trade, commerce, and economic competition (e.g., the industrialized West). Workers: Societies governed by knowledge, skills, expertise, robots, computers, both blue or white collar work. He argued that the next age would be led by the "caretakers" or "spiritual" caste, emphasizing global unity, ecological sustainability, and holistic thinking. Gender-Specific DynamicsTaub highlighted how societies evolve along a continuum of masculine and feminine energies. These are not restricted to biological genders but symbolize broader societal tendencies: Masculine Dominance: Characterized by aggression, hierarchy, and conquest. Feminine Reemergence: Marked by cooperation, nurturing, and interconnectedness. Taub suggested that modern civilization is transitioning toward a more balanced integration of these energies, with a growing emphasis on traditionally "feminine" values such as environmental care, empathy, and collaboration. The Four Global Regions and Their CyclesTaub divided the world into four regions based on historical influence: Western Civilization: Rooted in individualism, capitalism, and scientific innovation. Confucian Civilization: Grounded in collectivism, discipline, and long-term planning. Islamic Civilization: Influenced by faith, spirituality, and social order. Indic Civilization: Focused on inner growth, philosophy, and spirituality. He theorized that these regions rise and fall in prominence over time, and he predicted a shift toward Confucian and Indic values by the 21st century. Key Predictions from the ModelUsing his framework, Taub made several notable predictions: The Decline of the West: Taub foresaw a relative decline in Western dominance as other regions, particularly East Asia, rose in global influence. The Rise of China and Confucian Economies: He anticipated China's economic and cultural resurgence, along with other Confucian-based societies like South Korea and Singapore. The Emergence of a Global Spiritual Ethic: A transition from materialism to a global emphasis on spirituality, ecological consciousness, and human interconnectedness. The Integration of Feminine Principles: A shift toward a more balanced societal paradigm incorporating feminine values in governance, economy, and social structures. The "Spiritual Imperative"The central thesis of The Spiritual Imperative is that humanity's ultimate trajectory is toward a synthesis of material and spiritual concerns. Taub argued that the "spiritual caste" would emerge as leaders in the coming age, bringing a more harmonious and sustainable global civilization. His macrohistorical model is both predictive and prescriptive, offering a vision of where humanity might head if it aligns with these large-scale trends. How has his work been reviewed by his peers?Lawrence Taub's work has garnered attention for its innovative approach to understanding historical and future societal trends. His book, The Spiritual Imperative: Sex, Age, and Caste Move the Future, presents models that aim to clarify the past, explain the present, and help anticipate the future. In a recent reflection, Bill Kelly described Taub as a "gifted and creative theorist of history," highlighting the significance of his predictions and theoretical contributions. Additionally, Jan Krikke's publication, A Futurist for the 21st Century: The Macrohistory of Lawrence Taub (1936-2018), serves as both an introduction and a tribute to Taub's visionary work. Krikke emphasizes Taub's concept of societal "castes" as evolving stages of human development, noting that his macrohistory blends history, psychology, and spiritual philosophy to chart a path for individuals and societies in the 21st century. While these sources provide insights into Taub's contributions, comprehensive peer-reviewed analyses of his work are limited. Nonetheless, the available discussions suggest that Taub's theories offer a unique perspective on macrohistory and futurism, resonating with those interested in the interplay between historical patterns and future societal developments. For those interested in exploring Taub's work further, here are some of his notable publications: The Spiritual Imperative: Sex, Age, and Caste Move the Future In this book, Taub develops three models—age, sex, and caste—to reveal the deeper currents of history, providing insights into where human civilization has been and where it's going. When India Eclipses China: A Futurist's Prediction Taub examines the unexpected rise of India and its implications for global dynamics, offering a unique perspective on future geopolitical shifts. A Futurist for the 21st Century: The Macrohistory of Lawrence Taub (1936-2018) Authored by Jan Krikke, this book serves as an introduction and tribute to Taub's visionary work, exploring his concept of societal 'castes' and their relevance to contemporary society. These works provide a comprehensive overview of Taub's theories and predictions, offering valuable insights into his contributions to futurism and macrohistory. How does Taub fit into the wider field of the history of civilizations?Lawrence Taub's work fits into the wider field of the history of civilizations as a distinct and innovative contribution to macrohistory—a multidisciplinary approach to understanding the long-term patterns, cycles, and dynamics of human societies. His ideas resonate with and expand upon those of earlier thinkers while offering unique frameworks that reflect his own synthesis of history, sociology, and spiritual philosophy. Below is an analysis of where Taub fits in the broader tradition: 1. Connections to Prominent MacrohistoriansTaub's work aligns with the tradition of macrohistory, which seeks to understand civilizations in terms of large-scale patterns rather than isolated events. He shares commonalities with the following key figures: Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406) Taub's ideas about societal cycles and the rise and fall of civilizations echo Ibn Khaldun's Muqaddimah, which outlined a cyclical model of societal development and decay based on social cohesion (asabiyyah). Arnold J. Toynbee (1889-1975) Toynbee's A Study of History explored the life cycles of civilizations, emphasizing their responses to challenges and their potential for renewal or decline. Similarly, Taub analyzes how societies transition from one "age" or "caste" to another based on their internal dynamics and external pressures. Oswald Spengler (1880-1936) Spengler's The Decline of the West posited that civilizations are like living organisms, each with a predetermined life cycle. Taub diverges here, offering a more optimistic and less deterministic vision of humanity's potential to evolve toward higher consciousness. Pitirim Sorokin (1889-1968) Sorokin's theory of social and cultural dynamics, which oscillate between "ideational" (spiritual) and "sensate" (material) orientations, closely parallels Taub's view of humanity's current shift toward a "spiritual caste." 2. Unique ContributionsWhile Taub builds on these foundational thinkers, his work introduces unique perspectives that distinguish him from his predecessors: a. The Age-Caste Model Taub's tripartite model of history—dominated successively by Warriors, Priests, and Merchants—offers a simple yet powerful lens for understanding historical transitions. This model integrates economic, social, and spiritual dimensions in a way that broadens traditional historical analysis. b. Integration of Gender Dynamics Unlike many earlier macrohistorians, Taub places significant emphasis on the interplay between masculine and feminine principles in shaping civilizations. He argues that the "feminine reemergence" will play a pivotal role in the 21st century, a perspective that aligns with modern feminist and ecological movements. c. A Global Perspective While many macrohistorians focus on Western civilization or specific regions, Taub's framework is inherently global. His division of the world into Confucian, Indic, Islamic, and Western civilizations provides a comparative model that emphasizes interconnectedness and cross-cultural influence. d. The Spiritual Imperative Taub's belief that humanity is evolving toward a spiritual, ecological, and holistic ethos is a forward-looking and hopeful vision. This aligns his work with thinkers like Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, who also emphasized the spiritual evolution of humanity. 3. Relevance to Contemporary IssuesTaub's model has been lauded for its applicability to understanding modern global challenges: Geopolitical Shifts: His prediction of the rise of Confucian economies (e.g., China) and the increasing influence of Indic spirituality aligns with current global trends. Ecological and Feminist Movements: His emphasis on feminine values and ecological consciousness resonates with contemporary efforts to address climate change and gender equality. Global Unity and Spirituality: His vision of a "spiritual caste" leading humanity provides a framework for imagining a more unified and sustainable world order. 4. Critiques and LimitationsAs with many macrohistorians, Taub's work is subject to certain critiques: Generalization: Critics may argue that his age-caste model oversimplifies complex historical processes. Speculation: Predicting future societal trends is inherently speculative, and some of his forecasts may be viewed as overly optimistic or difficult to empirically validate. Spiritual Emphasis: Taub's focus on spirituality may not resonate with scholars who prioritize material or political explanations for historical change. 5. ConclusionLawrence Taub occupies a unique position in the history of civilizations. His integration of spiritual, gender, and global dynamics into macrohistorical analysis enriches the field and offers a hopeful, forward-looking perspective. While his ideas are speculative and sometimes controversial, they provide valuable tools for understanding the large-scale trajectories of human societies and their potential futures. How does he compare to Ken Wilber's model of cultural history?Lawrence Taub and Ken Wilber both propose models for understanding cultural history and the evolution of societies, but their approaches and emphases differ significantly. Below is a comparative analysis of their ideas: 1. Foundational FrameworkLawrence Taub: Age-Caste Model Taub's Age-Caste Model divides history into stages dominated by three primary societal archetypes: Warriors, Priests, and Merchants. These stages are driven by the overarching value systems and power structures of their times: Warriors: Physical strength and conquest. Priests: Spiritual and religious authority. Merchants: Economic and commercial priorities. Taub predicts a fourth age, led by the "spiritual caste," focused on global unity, ecological consciousness, and holistic thinking. Ken Wilber: Integral Model Wilber's Integral Theory is a comprehensive framework that categorizes human and cultural evolution into a series of developmental stages or levels of consciousness, often depicted as a spectrum. The stages range from archaic and magic-mythic to rational, pluralistic, and ultimately integral or transpersonal levels of consciousness. Wilber integrates quadrants (subjective, objective, intersubjective, interobjective dimensions), lines of development, and states of consciousness into a cohesive theory that spans psychology, sociology, and spirituality. 2. Scope of AnalysisLawrence Taub Focuses on macrohistorical patterns, examining the large-scale dynamics of civilizations across time. His analysis is global but grounded in tangible societal transitions (e.g., shifts in economic systems, power structures, and gender dynamics). Central to his theory is the idea that humanity is moving toward a spiritual age, influenced by environmental, cultural, and economic trends. Ken Wilber Wilber's model is multidimensional, encompassing personal, cultural, societal, and universal perspectives. It focuses on psychological and spiritual evolution, linking individual growth with collective cultural development. Wilber's approach is more holistic and metaphysical, offering a framework that explains everything from inner experience to external structures. 3. Spiritual EmphasisLawrence Taub Taub emphasizes the rise of spirituality as a societal force, particularly in response to the materialism of the Merchant age. His focus on spirituality is tied to ecological consciousness, gender equality, and the emergence of a globally unified "caretaker caste." His predictions are optimistic but remain grounded in observable trends (e.g., the rise of India and Confucian economies). Ken Wilber Wilber's framework integrates spirituality deeply into individual and collective evolution, often linking it to mystical traditions and transpersonal psychology. Wilber views spirituality as a natural stage in the developmental process, moving from mythic-religious interpretations to rational, pluralistic, and integral understandings. 4. Gender and Feminine DynamicsLawrence Taub Taub uniquely incorporates gender dynamics into his historical analysis, emphasizing the shift from masculine-dominated societies (war, conquest, and hierarchy) to a rebalancing of feminine and masculine energies. He ties this shift to ecological consciousness, nurturing principles, and a more cooperative global society. Ken Wilber Wilber's work touches on gender but does not emphasize it as a driving force in cultural history. Instead, he focuses on levels of consciousness that transcend gender distinctions while acknowledging the role of cultural conditioning. 5. Predictive vs. PrescriptiveLawrence Taub Taub is primarily predictive, using his Age-Caste Model to forecast societal trends, such as the decline of Western dominance, the rise of East Asia, and the increasing influence of spiritual values. His framework is a tool for understanding global trends and offers guidance for adapting to future changes. Ken Wilber Wilber is both prescriptive and descriptive. His Integral Model provides a framework for personal and collective growth, encouraging individuals to embrace higher stages of consciousness. His work aims to foster an integral worldview, which he believes is necessary for addressing global challenges. 6. Philosophical and Practical DifferencesLawrence Taub Philosophical Basis: Taub is grounded in macrohistory, emphasizing observable trends and cultural patterns. Practical Application: Taub's ideas are aimed at forecasting global shifts, with implications for geopolitics, economics, and social structures. Ken Wilber Philosophical Basis: Wilber draws from transpersonal psychology, philosophy, and systems theory. Practical Application: Wilber's Integral Theory serves as a personal and collective growth model, promoting an inclusive and holistic perspective for navigating complexity. 7. Key SimilaritiesBoth see history and culture as progressive, with humanity moving toward higher stages of development. Both emphasize the importance of spirituality in the evolution of human societies. Both aim to provide frameworks that integrate diverse perspectives and disciplines. 8. Key Differences
ConclusionLawrence Taub and Ken Wilber address similar themes of societal and spiritual evolution, but they approach them from different angles. Taub's work is primarily a macrohistorical analysis of societal trends, with an emphasis on gender dynamics and spiritual transitions. Wilber's Integral Theory is a more comprehensive framework, focusing on personal and collective consciousness across multiple dimensions. Both offer valuable insights into humanity's past, present, and potential future. How does Taub relate to the Vedic theory that we now live in the Kali Yuga?Lawrence Taub's macrohistorical model and the Vedic theory of the Kali Yuga both describe humanity's position within a broader cosmic or historical framework, emphasizing cycles of decline and renewal. While Taub does not explicitly align his model with Vedic concepts, there are several areas of thematic overlap and contrast: 1. Overview of the Kali Yuga in Vedic ThoughtIn Hindu cosmology, the Kali Yuga is the last and darkest of the four ages (Yugas) in the cyclical progression of time: The Satya Yuga (Golden Age) is characterized by truth, virtue, and spiritual harmony. The subsequent ages (Treta Yuga and Dvapara Yuga) see a gradual decline in morality, wisdom, and spiritual awareness. The Kali Yuga, the age we are currently believed to be in, is marked by materialism, moral decay, conflict, and disconnection from spiritual truths. However, it is also seen as a period of spiritual opportunity, where even small acts of devotion carry great merit. 2. Lawrence Taub's Model and Its Parallels to the Kali YugaTaub's framework, though not directly based on Vedic thought, shares key ideas with the Kali Yuga concept, especially in its description of humanity's current stage. Materialism and the Merchant Caste Taub's description of the Merchant Age, dominated by materialism, economic competition, and consumerism, aligns closely with the Vedic depiction of the Kali Yuga as a time of spiritual decline and overemphasis on material pursuits. The rise of the Merchant caste reflects a world driven by profit, power, and external success, rather than inner wisdom or spiritual values. Moral and Spiritual Decline Both Taub and the Vedic tradition describe the current period as one of widespread moral decay and spiritual disconnection. However, while the Kali Yuga is inherently seen as a period of decline, Taub views this phase as part of a broader, upward trajectory in which humanity is ultimately moving toward a spiritual age. Hope for Renewal In the Vedic tradition, the Kali Yuga is not permanent. It is followed by a renewal of the Satya Yuga, the Golden Age, through divine intervention or spiritual awakening. Similarly, Taub envisions a transition to a Caretaker Age, where humanity rebalances material and spiritual values, guided by a "spiritual caste" focused on global unity, ecological awareness, and holistic thinking. 3. Key DifferencesWhile there are parallels, Taub's model and the Vedic Kali Yuga differ in several significant ways: Linear vs. Cyclical Time The Vedic Yuga system is inherently cyclical, with civilizations continuously rising and falling in an eternal cosmic rhythm. Taub's framework, while acknowledging cycles of dominance (Warrior, Priest, Merchant), is fundamentally linear, envisioning an ultimate evolutionary progression toward higher spiritual awareness. Agency and Optimism In the Kali Yuga, divine forces often play a key role in initiating renewal (e.g., the prophesied arrival of Kalki Avatar). Humanity's agency in this renewal is secondary. Taub's vision is more human-centered and optimistic, suggesting that individuals and societies themselves can initiate the transition to the spiritual age through conscious choices and systemic changes. Cosmic and Theological Basis The Yuga system is deeply rooted in cosmology and theology, emphasizing the influence of divine will and cosmic cycles. Taub's model is secular and sociological, grounded in historical trends, power dynamics, and cultural shifts rather than divine intervention or metaphysical forces. 4. Complementary ThemesDespite their differences, Taub's ideas and the concept of the Kali Yuga can complement each other in understanding humanity's current challenges: Spiritual Opportunity Amid Decline: Both frameworks suggest that the current age, though fraught with challenges, provides unique opportunities for spiritual growth. Small acts of awareness and kindness may carry outsized importance. Ecological and Social Crisis as Catalysts: The Kali Yuga and Taub's Merchant Age both describe humanity at a critical juncture, where ecological and moral crises could act as triggers for profound transformation. Spiritual Awakening as a Path Forward: Both Taub and the Vedic tradition emphasize the importance of spirituality, morality, and interconnectedness in transcending the current age's limitations. 5. ConclusionLawrence Taub's macrohistorical model and the Vedic theory of the Kali Yuga share common ground in describing humanity's current phase as one of materialism, spiritual decline, and moral challenge. However, Taub's vision is more linear and optimistic, emphasizing humanity's capacity for self-driven transformation. The Vedic perspective, while more cyclical and divine-centered, also holds out hope for renewal and spiritual rebirth. Together, these perspectives offer complementary insights into the challenges and opportunities of our time. I am confused, is Taub's view of history an upward or downward view?Lawrence Taub's view of history can be best described as upward and evolutionary, though it acknowledges temporary declines and challenges along the way. His macrohistorical model emphasizes a long-term progression toward higher levels of human consciousness and societal organization, despite the struggles and crises of individual eras. Why It's an Upward ViewProgression Through Caste Dominance: Taub's model of history divides societal evolution into stages dominated by different "castes" or value systems: Warriors: Focus on physical strength and conquest. Priests: Dominance of religion and spiritual authority. Merchants: Rise of commerce, materialism, and economic priorities. While each stage brings its own challenges and limitations, Taub views these transitions as part of a broader evolution toward a more enlightened state. Emergence of the Spiritual Caste: Taub predicts the rise of a fourth caste—the Spiritual Caste or Caretaker Age—marked by ecological awareness, global unity, and holistic thinking. This future age represents humanity's potential to transcend materialism and moral decline, making his model inherently optimistic. Crises as Catalysts: Taub acknowledges periods of crisis, conflict, and moral decay (e.g., the current Merchant Age), but he sees these as necessary precursors to growth. Challenges serve as catalysts for transformation, pushing humanity toward greater understanding and balance. Contrast with a Downward ViewIn a downward view, like that of Oswald Spengler (The Decline of the West) or the Vedic concept of the Kali Yuga, history is seen as a cycle of rise and fall. Societies achieve greatness but inevitably decline into chaos and degeneration. This perspective tends to emphasize humanity's inability to escape cycles of destruction. Taub, by contrast, sees history as a linear progression with an upward trajectory. While there are moments of decline, these are steps in the larger process of humanity evolving to a higher state. Balancing Optimism with RealismTaub's model is not naï vely optimistic. He recognizes the dangers of materialism, environmental degradation, and societal fragmentation in the Merchant Age. However, he believes humanity has the capacity to: Overcome these challenges. Transition into a more spiritually conscious and globally cooperative phase. ConclusionTaub's view of history is fundamentally upward and evolutionary, focused on the long-term progression of human societies toward greater spiritual, ecological, and global awareness. While it acknowledges the difficulties of the present age, these are framed as necessary challenges on the path to a better future. Exlain the paradox in both Wilber and Taub that the current, most advanced stage is given to consumerism and materialism.The paradox in both Ken Wilber's and Lawrence Taub's frameworks is that the current, most advanced stage of human development—which represents a peak in human progress in terms of complexity, sophistication, and global interconnectedness—is also marked by consumerism, materialism, and moral/spiritual decline. This apparent contradiction arises because the developmental processes they describe often involve outgrowing earlier limitations, but also introducing new challenges or excesses at higher levels. Here's how this paradox manifests and is explained in their respective models: 1. Lawrence Taub's Model: The Merchant Age and Its ExcessesIn Taub's framework: The current Merchant Age (dominated by the "Merchant caste") is the most advanced historical stage so far, characterized by global trade, technology, and economic systems that connect the world like never before. This age represents a peak in material and economic progress. However, it is also marked by: Hyper-materialism: Overemphasis on profit, consumerism, and commodification. Erosion of spiritual and moral values: Decline in the influence of the Priest caste and spiritual principles, which previously provided meaning and balance. Ecological and social crises: Exploitation of natural resources and increasing inequality. The Paradox The very traits that make the Merchant Age "advanced"—its mastery of commerce, science, and globalization—are also what lead to its flaws. This reflects: Unbalanced progress: Material growth is pursued at the expense of spiritual, ecological, and ethical development. Transition stage: Taub views the Merchant Age as a necessary phase in humanity's evolution. Its excesses create the conditions for a spiritual awakening (the emergence of the "spiritual caste"), where materialism will be rebalanced by higher values. 2. Ken Wilber's Model: The Rational and Pluralistic LevelsIn Wilber's Integral Theory: Humanity has evolved through stages of consciousness, from archaic (basic survival) and magic-mythic (tribal or religious worldviews) to the rational (modern, scientific thinking) and pluralistic (postmodern, relativistic) levels. The rational stage, dominant in modernity, gave rise to incredible advancements: science, technology, democracy, and capitalism. However, it also fostered: Materialism: Overemphasis on external, measurable realities while neglecting inner, spiritual dimensions. Alienation: Fragmentation of community and loss of meaning in a hyper-individualistic society. Exploitation: Unchecked capitalism and environmental degradation. The pluralistic stage, emerging in postmodernity, critiques the excesses of the rational stage, emphasizing diversity, equality, and ecological awareness. However, it can also lead to: Relativism: Denial of universal truths, which can undermine spiritual and ethical grounding. Paralysis: A tendency to reject hierarchy and structured development, which impedes progress. The Paradox Wilber explains that each stage of development introduces new capabilities while also creating new problems. The rational and pluralistic levels, though advanced compared to earlier stages, are: Dominated by the ego: Focused on individualism and external achievement rather than inner growth. Incomplete: They lack integration with higher spiritual or holistic dimensions (e.g., the integral level that Wilber advocates). 3. Common Themes in the ParadoxBoth Taub and Wilber see the current age as a paradoxical culmination of progress and crisis, driven by: Material mastery without spiritual depth: Humanity has achieved unparalleled control over the material world but has not yet integrated these achievements with higher consciousness or values. Excess as a precursor to transformation: The very excesses of the current stage (consumerism, alienation, ecological collapse) are what push humanity to recognize the need for a more balanced and evolved approach. Transition to a higher stage: For Taub, the Merchant Age's flaws pave the way for the Spiritual Caste. For Wilber, the rational and pluralistic stages are stepping stones to the Integral Stage, where humanity integrates material, emotional, and spiritual dimensions. 4. Why the Paradox OccursThe paradox occurs because development is not linear; it often involves: Overcompensation: Each stage reacts to the limitations of the previous one, sometimes overemphasizing certain qualities (e.g., rationality, individualism) while neglecting others (e.g., spirituality, community). Growing pains: More advanced stages require greater complexity, which introduces new challenges. For example: Globalization (a hallmark of the Merchant Age) creates economic interdependence but also environmental and social crises. Rationality and science (modern achievements) displace superstition but can also marginalize spiritual perspectives. Integration lag: Higher stages initially struggle to integrate earlier values. Materialism dominates before spirituality and ethics can catch up. 5. Resolution of the ParadoxFor both Taub and Wilber, the resolution lies in transcending and including the current stage: Lawrence Taub: The Merchant Age will give way to a new Caretaker Age, where spirituality, ecological awareness, and balance will take precedence. The strengths of material progress will be integrated into a more holistic worldview. Ken Wilber: Humanity must move to the Integral Stage, where rationality and materialism are harmonized with spirituality, meaning, and global consciousness. ConclusionThe paradox of materialism at the most advanced stage reflects the growing pains of humanity's evolution. Both Taub and Wilber see the current challenges as temporary imbalances that will eventually be transcended, leading to a more integrated and spiritually aware future. While the current stage may seem contradictory, it is a necessary part of humanity's developmental journey. NOTES (Provided by Jan Krikke)From The Spiritual Imperative: [1]For Better or For Worse? Is humanity making any progress? Not according to postmodernists, whose anti-progress attitude is partly, and justifiably, a reaction to the oversimplified belief in progress that was popular in the 19th century. “The human race isn't going anywhere except round in circles or downhill,” many say today. But, as we will see later, this attitude can be explained by the fact that we live deep in the Worker Age, the least religious and spiritual of the five ages, therefore the one with the least hope—either of joy in this life or in a future one after death. No hope and no faith in progress are two very compatible sentiments. Be that as it may, the Caste Model gives a clear “yes” in answer to the question, “Is humanity making progress?” The human race steadily evolves and progresses. True, the three non-spiritual-religious ages get increasingly out of touch with reality. Yet each, at the same time, is an improvement over the one before. Each raises humanity higher on the evolutionary ladder, makes it more mature, and raises its spiritual consciousness. Every caste revolution and age introduces new human suffering and problems. But they also relieve the suffering and solve the problems of the age before. The Warrior Age, for example, introduced the horrors of war, brutality, and sexual and class oppression on a scale unknown in the preceding Spiritual-Religious Age No. 1. Yet at the same time, the warriors made the world smaller (through conquest and empire), allowed business, trade, and crafts to flourish, released the individual spirit from the grip of the group and of nature, and created a sense of individual morality, responsibility, and individuality per se. The warrior world view strengthened the individual will, and energized the struggle to pursue worthy goals, explore the unknown, and embark on spiritual quests. The warriors promoted reason, clear thinking, science, and the development of the mind in general. The conquests of warrior emperors like Constantine and Ashoka spread advanced spiritual consciousness to the masses through Christianity and Buddhism, respectively, and the warrior world view enabled more people to reach higher states of spiritual awareness than was possible in the previous age. The Merchant Age ushered in the familiar evils of capitalism, commercialism, urban industrial blight, money, wage-slavery, European colonialism and imperialism, mechanized warfare, and the rest. Yet the merchant caste also raised the level of material well-being of the masses, accelerated science and technology, launched the Industrial Revolution, ended slavery, introduced the first wave of modern feminist revolution, and spread the modern concept of democracy for all. Need I describe to you the suffering and problems of our present Worker Age? Of course not. Yet at the same time the worker caste was the first to reject war and imperialism in principle and to promote peace. It developed class consciousness and solidarity, and embraced class, sexual, racial, and ethnic equality. It was the first to demand for all the right to basic needs such as food, housing, education, and medical care. Progress through the ages was uneven, and at times hard to discern through the suffering and problems, but it would be hard to deny that the human race has made spiritual as well as material progress throughout the ages. (The Spiritual Imperative, p. 44-45) [2] “Humanity Has Progressed Materially, But Not Spiritually, Since the Stone Age”—A Truism, But Not True Every caste age advanced human spirituality beyond the age before it. In the Warrior Age, the warrior caste was not just a caste of killers, rapists, and patriarchs. It was also a caste of heroes and heroines. That “heroic age” developed the human spirit even further than the preceding Spiritual- Religious Age No. 1. Through conquest, warriors and kings like Constantine and Ashoka spread the advanced spiritual consciousness of the world religions: Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism. That age also produced a thirst for individual freedom, enlightenment, and personal salvation. Exceptional individuals experienced higher states of consciousness than ever before. The human being, with a developed ego, was no longer in what Ken Wilber calls a “mama's boy”—totally dependent—relationship to “Mother” Nature, tribe, and family. Finally, the Warrior Age developed a sense of moral and ethical responsibility. People could act independently for good against bad, rather than feel forced to accept either with passive fatalism. The age developed focused rational thinking, leading to science, technology, and a sophisticated social-economic system that included abundant agriculture-based economies, great civilizations, and worldwide trade and commerce. However, since warfare, conquest, petty imperialism, slavery, and feudalism were the base of the system, only a lucky few could experience the high consciousness levels and economic affluence that were possible. The masses experienced only slavery, serfdom, and exploitation by the warrior elites. In the Merchant Age spirituality advanced further. Despite the economic progress of the Warrior Age, the Merchant Age was the first of the two ages centered around the economy. That's because the merchant caste's main focus was business. Pursuing money and wealth through business, that caste spread the market system to every remote corner, launched the Industrial Revolution, and split everyone into half producer and half consumer. One produced one or more things for the market but consumed everything else from it. In accomplishing all this economic stuff, the merchants unleashed tremendous spiritual forces. They radically shifted humanity's attention from the other world—the next life—to this world and life. Europeans familiarized themselves with the Earth's roundness and ever-shrinking smallness—its sounds, sights, smells, tastes, and feel. They did this through art, science, religion, politics, and exploration of parts of the world hitherto unknown to them. That was what the three important movements of the age—the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Enlightenment—were all about. This busy-ness raised human spirituality, first of all, because it led masses of humans to integrate the outer, sensory, physical world of everyday life with the inner world of thought and spirit. The three movements and the economic activities also “spiritualized” the system by raising political consciousness: They led to democracy, individual freedom, and parliamentary government. This political spiritualization became embodied in the founding of the United States—the model which every other country used to spiritualize its own political system. But the merchant caste's focus was money, not spirituality. So its system was not as spiritual in practice as in theory. Few merchant-caste capitalists had the spiritual sensitivity to avoid earning their fortunes, directly or indirectly, from imperialism, war, the arms trade, the exploitation of women, child labor, and slaves, or the slave trade. The lives of most workers had little more spiritual content than in the Warrior Age. Spending most hours toiling in merchant-owned factories or farms, they merely switched from being slaves, serfs, and peasants to being wage slaves. Kaliyuga's Feet of Clay The present Worker Age has advanced human spirituality further still. It was the first age to reject war and imperialism, to try world government, and to deeply embrace Equality—sexual, racial, ethnic, class, and age. It was the first age to deeply embrace Fraternity—brother- and sisterhood, worker-class consciousness, and collective action. Worker-age Fraternity is much more inclusive and advanced than the tribal fraternity of Spiritual- Religious Age No. 1. The Worker Age has been the first age to set up systems that provide for the basic material, practical, and spiritual needs of the worker caste: food, shelter, medical care, education, culture, and participation in economic and political decision-making. It is the first age to recognize workers' human rights and to protect workers from total exploitation by the other castes. Now workers can aspire to higher stages of consciousness and spirituality as individuals. But like the Warrior and Merchant Ages, the Worker Age is more spiritual in theory than in practice. We can see this by comparing its worker-caste world view to that of the newly-rising spiritual-religious caste. A good example of the “classic” worker-caste world view is that of the bureaucrat working in a Nazi concentration camp. Routinely processing victims for gassing, the bureaucrat's only concern is doing the job as required. Assuming he or she did not take the job to satisfy a private sadistic urge, or, conversely, to help victims or sabotage the system, the bureaucrat seems to have no compassion for the victim nor questioning of the meaning and ethics of the job. This is the extreme case of worker-caste lack of spirituality, but the attitude resembles that of many workers who deal with the public. Who has not come up against it? Though it varies from country to country, and though most bureau employees behave humanly, whenever there is a conflict between the needs of the individual and the rules or real or imagined interests of the system, the bureaucrat tends to put the system first. This “I'm-just-doing-my-job” attitude is found in every job and profession. The scientist who pursues any experiment, designs any device or weapon, or works for any company, without questioning the ethics or consequences of these, expresses the same attitude. The spiritual-religious caste person—most militants and fundamentalists aside—puts priority on exactly what the worker-caste person shrugs off—the concern, compassion, and questioning. If such a person found herself working in a concentration camp (maybe she didn't read the job description carefully), she would be in a hell of a mess. She would certainly try to do the job “poorly,” or help the victims, or might risk her life by refusing and protesting. If she could do none of these, she would suffer guilt and inner torment. In any work situation, the spiritual-religious person puts human individual needs ahead of the rules or interests of the system, when the two are in conflict. He will go all out to do a job well only if it has spiritual content, or at least is not anti-spiritual. In these ways he acts to “spiritualize” the system. (The Spiritual Imperative, p. 210-212)
Comment Form is loading comments...
|