• home
• about
• new
• essays
• AI
• book

Dr. Joseph Dillard is a psychotherapist with over forty year's clinical experience treating individual, couple, and family issues. Dr. Dillard also has extensive experience with pain management and meditation training. The creator of Integral Deep Listening (IDL), Dr. Dillard is the author of over ten books on IDL, dreaming, nightmares, and meditation. He lives in Berlin, Germany. See: integraldeeplistening.com and his YouTube channel. He can be contacted at: [email protected]

SEE MORE ESSAYS WRITTEN BY JOSEPH DILLARD

Accountability and Collapse

Why Civilizations Fail When They Violate Evolutionary Balance

Joseph Dillard / ChatGPT

A frequent refrain in Integral, metamodern, and spiritually oriented discourse is that contemporary Western civilization is undergoing a “meaning crisis.” Frank Visser's recent essay, “Is There Really a “Meaning Crisis” in the West?, A Comparison of Wilber, Peterson and Vervaeke,” is excellent and points to how this formulation is a dead end. While such framings are rhetorically attractive, they fundamentally misdiagnose the problem. Civilizations do not collapse because they lack meaning, nor because they fail to articulate moral ideals. They collapse because they fall out of alignment with basic evolutionary principles governing cooperation, adaptation, and self-organization.

The point is not that civilizations deserve to collapse. That is beside the issue. They collapse because they must, because systems that violate evolutionary constraints eventually lose coherence, resilience, and legitimacy. No amount of consciousness discourse, moral rhetoric, or symbolic meaning-making can override these constraints.

This essay argues that the core crisis facing the contemporary West is not located in the Upper-Left (UL) quadrant of consciousness and intent or in the Lower-Left (LL) quadrant of values, meaning, or culture, but in the Lower-Right (LR) quadrant of collective structures, specifically, the erosion of accountability mechanisms that regulate cooperation at every evolutionary level.

Evolutionary Balance: Adaptation and Reorganization

Across biological, psychological, and social systems, viability depends on a dynamic balance between adaptation and reorganization, survival and cooperation, competition and reciprocity, precipitation (generation) and sublimation (reorganization).

At the social level, these balances are stabilized by a small set of irreducible cooperative principles: respect, reciprocity, empathy, and trustworthiness. These are not moral preferences; they are evolutionary building blocks. Where they are reliably instantiated, systems endure. Where they are violated without correction, systems destabilize. Responsibility and accountability are simply the structural expressions of these principles at collective scales.

Accountability Is Not a Value

A crucial error in much contemporary discourse, including Integral, is the assumption that accountability is a cultural or moral achievement, a Lower-Left value that emerges with higher consciousness. It is not. Accountability is an objective structural requirement, not a moral aspiration. It operates at every evolutionary level. In physics, we call it predictability; in biology, reliability; in attachment theory, consistency; and in social systems, accountability. These are different names for the same principle. A system, whether neuronal, familial, organizational, or civilizational, must reliably link actions to consequences. When that linkage breaks, cooperation collapses. When cooperation collapses systems lose coherence. They collapse back into some prior, more stable state.

AQAL Mapping of the Crisis

Upper-Left (UL): Consciousness Without Constraint

At the individual interior level, the contemporary West displays no shortage of sophisticated consciousness states, ethical reflection, or spiritual aspiration. Indeed, many of the most fervent supporters of destructive geopolitical policies are articulate, educated, and morally earnest. Consider the long parade of enlightened gurus and pundits who preach meaning and morality but do not practice accountability themselves. This demonstrates a critical point: higher consciousness is not correlated with responsibility or accountability. You and I may be deeply reflective, spiritually literate, and morally motivated, and still function within systems that produce mass harm. UL development does not substitute for LR constraint.

For example, we may sincerely value compassion while repeatedly failing to show up on time, honor commitments, or take responsibility for harm caused. Insight does not compensate for unreliability. Relationships collapse not because meaning is absent, but because accountability is.

Upper-Right (UR): Behavior Without Feedback

At the behavioral level, stress physiology, media saturation, and threat narratives narrow cognition and normalize escalation. When systems fail to provide corrective feedback, maladaptive behavior persists. When governments repeatedly initiate military actions without formal declarations of war, without legislative authorization, and without consequences for failure, escalation becomes habitual. Behavior continues not because it works, but because nothing stops it. This is not irrationality; it is predictable behavior in the absence of feedback. Look at Israel. The genocide continues not because Israels are “bad,” “immoral,” or at some lower level of development. It continues because there is not only no accountability for genocide; it is socially and collectively reinforced and a failure to support genocide is socially and collectively punished.

Lower-Left (LL): Values as Cover Stories

Cultural narratives in the West remain saturated with moral language: democracy, human rights, freedom, or rules-based order. These values are not absent. They are omnipresent. They are used to blame and condemn those who don't support their narratives of foreign authoritarianism and aggression.

When values are decoupled from enforcement, they function as symbolic cover rather than regulatory force. For example, civilian casualties, collective punishment, and violations of international law are rhetorically condemned, unless committed by allied states, in which case they are reframed, minimized, or disappear from discourse altogether. Putin is Hitler, and so those who disagree with the prevailing Western narrative regarding the ongoing war with Russia are immoral appeasers of aggression. This is not a failure of morality. It is morality rendered impotent by structural exemption. Morality becomes merely a form of self-righteous virtue-signaling functioning as an attempt to stifle dissent through moral shaming.

Lower-Right (LR): Structural Accountability Failure (The Core Problem)

Appeals to UL “meaning” and righteous intent, or to LL “values” of democracy, human rights, and freedom become avoidance strategies. Responsibility and accountability in the LR are bypassed, as if they either do not exist or do not matter. When and where do Wilber, Peterson, and Vervaeke talk about their own accountability? When and where do supporters of Atlanticism talk about the accountability of the West for supporting and enabling genocide, fascism, terrorism, and censorship?

On a civilizational level, war powers are bypassed. International law, as in the UN Charter, the ICJ and ICC, is selectively enforced or ignored. Enforcement authority is withdrawn from oversight bodies like the World Trade Commission. If world enforcement organizations cannot be captured they are neutered. Sanctions that violate international law continue without accountability, harming civilian populations. Media normalizes violations through repetition and silence. Institutions protect themselves rather than correct course. This is not a “crisis of meaning.” This is not a “failure of morality.” It is a conscious, consistent pattern of avoidance of responsibility and accountability. Pointing the finger, saying, “Everybody does it” is merely an attempt to change the subject to avoid responsibility.

In AQAL terms, the LR quadrant has lost its capacity for error correction. When violations produce no consequences, irresponsibility becomes adaptive. Trust erodes, cooperation collapses, and systems fragment. This is not a moral drama or a Greek tragedy of hubris; it is an evolutionary inevitability.

Why Collapse Is Predictable

Civilizations that institutionalize the evasion of accountability inevitably violate the balance between survival and cooperation. They privilege short-term advantage over long-term trust. They substitute moral rhetoric for structural correction. History is unambiguous on this point.

Late Rome maintained moral certainty while hollowing out enforcement. Imperial Britain spoke of civilization while exhausting legitimacy. The Soviet Union preserved ideological meaning while suppressing feedback. Collapse did not occur because meaning was lost. It occurred because systems would no longer self-correct. The longer necessary accountability is postponed the greater the price for change becomes. Avoidance increases. The price for change mounts. When accountability becomes unavoidable the price that is paid is likely to be horrendous.

The contemporary West is following the same trajectory, not due to cynicism, but due to structural irresponsibility protected by moral language. This is why it is not enough to critique “loss of meaning,” like Wilber, Peterson, and Vervaeke do. This is why it is not enough to equate Putin with Hitler because that is a misdirection away from the ways we in the West behave like Putin and Hitler. It is a way we avoid accountability in the LR.

Reframing the Crisis

What we are facing is not a meaning, morality, or consciousness crisis. It is a crisis of accountability infrastructure. It is much easier to see that in others, as in Wilber dodging accountability for chronically avoiding the arguments of his critics.

Until responsibility is structurally reattached to action, until consequences apply irrespective of power, ideology, or moral self-image, no amount of meaning-making will stabilize the system. Parents instinctively understand this principle in child rearing. “He hit me first!” is not accepted by parents as justification for aggression by a child. The healthy solution is not to punish the child but to turn it into a teaching occasion regarding the enforcement of behavioral boundaries and why they are required for all parties. Accountability must be taught and it must be reinforced. If we lack the maturity to do so for ourselves, we must submit to institutions that will force us to do so. That is the reason for the unfortunate institution of law. We cannot be expected to play by the rules if there are none clearly articulated or, if they are, they are not enforced.

Individuals, groups, nations, and entire civilizations do not collapse because they abandon their values; they collapse because they violate the evolutionary conditions that make values enforceable. That is not a judgment. It is a description of how complex systems behave. No aliens, messiah, guru, or moral teachings will save us from ourselves. We either police ourselves and hold ourselves accountable or circumstances will do that for us. If we manage to get away with it, our children and grandchildren will not. They will pay the price for our irresponsibility.