• home
• about
• new
• essays
• AI
• book

Jan Krikke is a former Japan correspondent for various media and former managing editor of Asia 2000 in Hong Kong. He pioneered the study of axonometry, the Chinese equivalent of European linear perspective overlooked by Jean Gebser. He is the author of several books, including Leibniz, Einstein, and China, and the editor of The Spiritual Imperative, a macrohistory based on the Indian Varna system by feminist futurist Larry Taub.

Consciousness in a Cultural Context

Jan Krikke

The meaning of the word consciousness has changed over time. Moreover, the word does not translate very well into Asian languages. Chinese and Indian views of consciousness reflect their distinct worldviews.

Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence gives the study of consciousness a new topicality. AI experts are debating whether AI can develop consciousness. Assuming it can, what kind of consciousness would it develop?

Below are four questions to ChatGPT on the distinction between Western, Chinese, and Indian consciousness.

Q1 - THE WORD CONSCIOUSNESS HAS GAINED MUCH CURRENCY IN RECENT DECADES IN THE WEST. WHAT IS THE ORIGIN OF THE WORD AND WHEN DID IT GET ITS CURRENT MEANING?

The word consciousness has a long history, originating from Latin and evolving in meaning over time.

Etymology

Latin origins: The word comes from the Latin term "conscientia" (from con meaning "with" and scire meaning "to know"), which translates to "knowledge within oneself," or "shared knowledge." In classical Latin, conscientia primarily referred to moral awareness or a sense of right and wrong—essentially what we might now call "conscience" rather than "consciousness" in the modern sense.

Early English usage: The term consciousness entered the English language around the early 17th century. Initially, it was used in a somewhat moral or reflective sense, similar to its Latin root, referring to self-awareness in terms of ethical or personal responsibility.

Evolution of Meaning

17th century philosophy: The modern sense of the word started to emerge in the works of philosophers during the 17th century. One key figure in this evolution was René Descartes (1596-1650), whose famous statement cogito, ergo sum ("I think, therefore I am") placed self-awareness and reflective thought at the center of the philosophical conception of consciousness. In Descartes' framework, consciousness referred to the state of being aware of one's thoughts and existence.

John Locke: English philosopher John Locke (1632-1704) played a significant role in further defining the concept of consciousness as personal identity and self-awareness. In his Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), Locke described consciousness as the ability of a person to perceive and reflect on their own mental processes, thus emphasizing a psychological and personal dimension.

18th and 19th centuries: By the 18th and 19th centuries, consciousness began to be associated more broadly with awareness of thoughts, sensations, and external stimuli. Romantic and idealist philosophers, such as Immanuel Kant and G.W.F. Hegel, expanded the concept of consciousness to include subjective experience and the idea of the self in relation to the world.

20th century and beyond: In the 20th century, with the rise of psychology, neuroscience, and cognitive science, the term consciousness became more scientifically oriented. Researchers began exploring the mechanics of awareness, perception, and selfhood. By this time, consciousness referred to the state of being aware of and able to think about one's own existence, thoughts, and surroundings, in both philosophical and scientific contexts.

Modern Usage

Today, consciousness has multiple layers of meaning, primarily referring to:

1. Awareness: The state of being awake and aware of one's surroundings.

2. Self-awareness: The ability to recognize oneself as an individual separate from the environment and others.

3. Subjective experience: The internal, qualitative experience of thoughts, emotions, and sensations (often called qualia in philosophy of mind).

In modern times, especially with the rise of cognitive science and debates about artificial intelligence and machine consciousness, the term has gained additional currency as a focal point for discussions about the nature of mind and reality.

In summary, while the word consciousness has roots in Latin moral thought, its modern meaning developed largely in the 17th century, with philosophers like Descartes and Locke playing key roles in its evolution into a concept of self-awareness and perception.

Q2 - THE CLOSEST EQUIVALANT TO THE WESTERN WORD CONSCIOUSNESS IN CHINESE IS "XIN", WHICH SEEMS TO HAVE A CONFUCIUAN CONNOTATIONS. CAN YOU ELABORATE ON THE MEANING OF XIN IN A CHINESE CONTEXT?

In Chinese philosophy and traditional culture, the term 心S (xīn) is a complex and multifaceted concept, often translated as "heart," "mind," or "heart-mind." While the term does not directly correspond to the Western notion of "consciousness," it shares some overlapping meanings, particularly in relation to awareness, intention, and moral sense. Its significance varies across different philosophical traditions, but it is deeply embedded in Confucian, Daoist, and Buddhist thought.

Key Meanings of "Xin" (心)

1. Heart-Mind:

In Chinese, xīn often refers to the unity of both emotional and cognitive faculties, encapsulating both feeling (heart) and thinking (mind). This is a departure from the Western tradition, where the "heart" and "mind" are often considered separate or even opposing faculties. In the Chinese context, the heart and mind are intertwined, reflecting the idea that emotions and thoughts are interconnected in shaping a person's actions and moral understanding.

2. Consciousness or Awareness:

Xīn can also refer to a broader sense of awareness or attentiveness to the world. In this sense, it carries some similarities to the Western idea of consciousness, but it is rooted in the ethical and relational aspects of life. It is not simply awareness in a neutral, cognitive sense, but awareness that is deeply connected to one's moral duties and emotional relationships.

3. Intention and Will:

Another key dimension of xīn is its reference to intention, will, or motivation. It is the seat of desires, decisions, and moral inclinations. In Confucianism, for instance, xīn is closely tied to ethical behavior, since a person's intentions are seen as crucial to their moral character. This is similar to how conscientia in Latin (from which "consciousness" derives) also had moral connotations.

Xin in Confucianism

In Confucian thought, xīn is central to understanding morality and human relationships. The Confucian view of xīn is primarily concerned with its role in ethical cultivation and moral reflection.

Moral Heart-Mind: Confucius and later Confucian philosophers such as Mencius (Mengzi) emphasized the role of xīn in moral decision-making and self-cultivation. Mencius argued that humans are born with an innate moral sense, or xīn, that is naturally inclined toward goodness. He likened this moral heart-mind to the emotions of compassion, shame, respect, and moral discernment.

Mencius famously said, "The heart of compassion is the beginning of benevolence (仁), the heart of shame is the beginning of righteousness (義), the heart of respect is the beginning of propriety (禮), and the heart of right and wrong is the beginning of wisdom (智)." In this view, xīn serves as the moral compass that guides ethical behavior and forms the basis of human virtues.

Xin as Moral Agency: In Confucianism, the cultivation of xīn is essential for achieving moral excellence and social harmony. The idea is that by refining one's heart-mind through education, self-reflection, and proper behavior, one can align themselves with the Dao (the Way) and act in accordance with virtues like ren (benevolence) and li (ritual propriety). The balance of emotional sensitivity and rational thought in xīn is key to moral agency.

Xin in Daoism

In Daoist philosophy, xīn takes on a somewhat different character, particularly in relation to notions of spontaneity, simplicity, and naturalness.

Returning to Simplicity: Daoist texts like the Dao De Jing emphasize a more passive, reflective, and meditative use of xīn. While Confucianism emphasizes the ethical cultivation of the heart-mind for the betterment of society, Daoism tends to focus on the idea of returning xīn to a state of simplicity and stillness, free from desires and societal constraints. The ideal state of xīn in Daoism is one of alignment with the Dao, the natural way of things, where one's heart-mind becomes calm, clear, and in harmony with the flow of the universe.

Emptying the Heart-Mind: Daoist practices often involve "emptying" the xīn of distractions and desires in order to attain a state of inner peace and spontaneous action (known as wuwei, or non-action). This contrasts with Confucianism's focus on conscious cultivation and moral development.

Xin in Buddhism

In Chinese Buddhism, particularly Chan (Zen) Buddhism, xīn plays a central role in understanding the nature of mind and consciousness, with an emphasis on direct experience and the cultivation of awareness.

Mind and Awareness: In Chan Buddhism, xīn is often associated with the mind's ability to perceive the true nature of reality, beyond conceptual thought. The focus is on direct, experiential awareness rather than intellectual understanding. Meditation practices aim to cultivate xin by stilling mental distractions and achieving mindfulness, allowing the practitioner to see reality as it truly is—empty of inherent existence yet full of interconnectedness.

Buddha-nature and Xin: Some Buddhist schools equate xīn with Buddha-nature, the inherent potential for enlightenment within every individual. This is the purest form of mind, untouched by ignorance or delusion, and discovering this true xīn is key to attaining enlightenment.

Summary of "Xin" in Chinese Contexts

In Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism, the term xīn reflects a nuanced and dynamic concept that encompasses heart, mind, awareness, morality, and intention. While it doesn't directly translate to "consciousness" in the Western sense, it captures aspects of human experience that overlap with it, particularly in the realms of self-awareness, moral reasoning, and emotional sensitivity.

Confucianism: Xin is about the moral heart-mind that guides virtuous action.

Daoism: Xin is something to be emptied, aligning with the Dao through simplicity and non-action.

Buddhism: Xin is closely linked to mindfulness, awareness, and the realization of Buddha-nature.

The richness of xīn in these philosophical traditions demonstrates its importance not only in individual consciousness but also in moral development, social harmony, and spiritual enlightenment.

In ancient China, the heart was thought of not only as an organ that controls the circulatory system, but also as the source of consciousness and where feelings and thoughts are harbored. Therefore, Xīn became a crucial root character for compound words that have to do with describing one's nature, thoughts and feelings.

Q3 - WHAT IS THE CLOSEST EQUIVALENCE TO THE WESTERN WORD CONSCIOUSNESS IN INDIAN (VEDIC) CULTURE?

In Indian (Vedic) culture, the closest equivalent to the Western concept of consciousness is often expressed through the Sanskrit term चेतना (chetanā), which refers to awareness or consciousness in a broad, philosophical, and spiritual sense. However, the Vedic and later Hindu traditions have a complex and multifaceted understanding of consciousness that integrates individual awareness, cosmic consciousness, and the ultimate reality. This understanding is embedded in several key concepts:

Key Concepts of Consciousness in Vedic Culture

1. Chetanā (चेतना):

Chetanā is a Sanskrit term that means "consciousness" or "awareness." It refers to the quality of being aware, alive, or sentient. It is commonly used to describe the presence of consciousness in living beings, indicating their ability to experience and respond to the world.

In this sense, it overlaps with the Western idea of consciousness as awareness or the state of being conscious, but it often includes a spiritual or metaphysical dimension, relating to the soul or higher levels of awareness.

2. ātman (आत्मन्):

One of the most central concepts in Vedic philosophy, particularly in the Upanishads, is the notion of ātman. ātman refers to the individual self or soul, but in a deeper sense, it is the innermost consciousness or true self that transcends the body and mind.

ātman is often described as the eternal, unchanging consciousness that underlies a person's identity. While Western notions of consciousness are usually tied to cognition and mental processes, ātman points to a more spiritual dimension of consciousness, suggesting that the true essence of consciousness is divine and immutable.

In Advaita Vedanta (non-dualism), a major school of Hindu philosophy, ātman is considered identical to Brahman, the universal consciousness or the ultimate reality.

3. Brahman (ब्रह्मन्):

Brahman is the concept of the ultimate, infinite, and all-encompassing reality in Vedic and Upanishadic thought. It represents the cosmic consciousness, the source and substratum of everything in the universe. Brahman is described as the pure consciousness that is beyond all dualities and is the essence of all existence.

In Advaita Vedanta, it is taught that ātman (the individual self) and Brahman (the universal self) are one and the same. Therefore, individual consciousness is not separate from the universal consciousness; rather, they are manifestations of the same underlying reality. This is expressed in the famous Upanishadic phrase Tat Tvam Asi ("Thou art that"), which means the individual is identical with the universal.

While Western consciousness is often seen as individual and personal, Brahman encompasses both individual and universal consciousness, suggesting an interconnectedness of all beings.

4. Puruṣa (पुरुष):

In the Samkhya and Yoga schools of Indian philosophy, Puruṣa refers to pure consciousness, the unchanging, eternal witness to all phenomena. It is distinct from Prakriti (the material world or nature), which includes the mind, body, and all physical matter.

Puruṣa is the silent observer, the transcendental consciousness that does not act but simply observes the play of nature (Prakriti). This concept closely parallels the notion of pure awareness, devoid of mental constructs, which aligns with certain aspects of the Western philosophical discussions of consciousness as a detached observer or subject.

5. Chit (चित्):

Chit is a key component of the phrase Sat-Chit-Ananda (Being-Consciousness-Bliss), which describes the nature of Brahman in Vedanta. Chit specifically refers to consciousness or pure awareness, the aspect of reality that is aware of itself.

In this view, consciousness is not just a property of the mind but a fundamental aspect of existence itself. It is the essence of everything, suggesting that everything in the universe is imbued with some level of consciousness. Chit is unconditioned, non-dual awareness, and it transcends the limited, individual experience of the mind.

6. Ahamkara (अहंकार):

Ahamkara means the "I-maker" and is often translated as the ego or sense of self in Indian philosophy. It represents the part of the mind that identifies with the body, mind, and personality, creating a limited sense of individuality.

While Western discussions of consciousness often focus on subjective experience and self-awareness, Ahamkara is seen in Indian thought as a source of illusion (maya), because it falsely identifies the self (Atman) with the material world and the ego. Overcoming Ahamkara through spiritual practice leads to the realization of one's true self as Atman, which is universal consciousness.

Different Levels of Consciousness

In Vedic and later Hindu thought, consciousness is often described as existing in various states or levels, which are central to understanding the nature of the self and the universe.

1. Jāgrat (जाग्रत्) - Waking consciousness:

This is the state of ordinary, waking awareness in which the mind is engaged with the external world through the senses. It corresponds most closely to what is often referred to as consciousness in Western thought, where the individual is aware of their surroundings, thoughts, and sensations.

Svapna (स्वप्न) - Dreaming consciousness:

This is the state of consciousness during dreams, where the mind creates internal experiences independent of external reality. In this state, the mind is still active, but it is dealing with impressions and images from memory rather than direct sensory input.

3. Suṣupti (सुषुप्ति) - Deep sleep:

In this state, there is no awareness of the external world or even dreams. However, according to Vedantic thought, consciousness is still present in a potential form, as the individual self (Atman) remains aware in a non-manifest way, beyond the mind's activities. This state is significant because it suggests a level of consciousness that transcends active mental processes.

4. Turīya (तुरीय) - The fourth state:

Turīya is described as a transcendental state of pure consciousness, beyond waking, dreaming, and deep sleep. It is the state of realization of the self as Brahman, the ultimate reality. In this state, the individual transcends all dualities and experiences unity with the cosmic consciousness. Turīya is often considered the highest state of awareness in Vedic and Upanishadic traditions, equivalent to enlightenment or self-realization.

Summary of Consciousness in Indian (Vedic) Thought

ātman: The individual soul or self, representing one's true consciousness, which is eternal and identical to the universal Brahman.

Brahman: The ultimate, all-pervading cosmic consciousness or reality, with which individual consciousness (ātman) is ultimately unified.

Chetanā: General awareness or sentient consciousness, often used to describe the living state of beings.

Puruṣa: Pure consciousness, separate from the material world, observing without acting.

Chit: Pure awareness, a fundamental aspect of reality in Vedantic philosophy.

Ahamkara: The ego or false sense of individual self, which creates the illusion of separateness from the universal consciousness.

In Vedic and post-Vedic Indian traditions, consciousness is not merely a mental or cognitive phenomenon, as it is often considered in Western thought, but a deeper, spiritual reality that connects the individual to the cosmos and the ultimate truth. It integrates personal awareness with metaphysical concepts like ātman and Brahman, suggesting that true consciousness is a path to realizing oneness with the universe.

Q4 - WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ANTAHKARANA IN VEDIC THOUGHT?

In Indian philosophy, particularly in Vedanta and Yoga, the mind (Antahkarana, meaning "inner instrument") is often seen as comprising four distinct functions or parts. These four parts are closely tied to the concept of Ahamkara (the ego or sense of individuality), as they all contribute to how the ego shapes perception and experience. The four aspects of the mind are:

1. Manas (मनस्) - The Mind or Sensory Processor

2. Buddhi (बुद्धि) - Intellect or Discriminative Faculty

3. Ahamkara (अहंकार) - Ego or "I-Maker"

4. Chitta (चित्त) - Memory or Storehouse of Impressions

Each of these components plays a vital role in how a person experiences reality, perceives themselves, and interacts with the world. Let's explore each one in detail:

1. Manas (मनस्) - The Mind or Sensory Processor

Function: Manas is responsible for processing sensory input and coordinating between the sense organs and the internal experiences. It receives impressions from the external world through the senses (sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell) and organizes them into coherent experiences. Manas is the part of the mind that is constantly engaged in perceiving, thinking, doubting, imagining, and desiring.

Role: As the processor of sensory information, Manas is active in forming thoughts, feelings, and responses to the external environment. However, it lacks the ability to discern or judge—its role is more mechanical, simply taking in data from the senses. It is responsible for basic decision-making but relies on Buddhi for higher reasoning.

Connection to Ahamkara: Since Manas is concerned with sensory experience, it often feeds into the Ahamkara, reinforcing the ego's sense of separation by identifying with sensory experiences, desires, and external stimuli. The ego tends to identify with the experiences processed by the Manas, creating attachment and emotional reactions.

2. Buddhi (बुद्धि) - Intellect or Discriminative Faculty

Function: Buddhi is the aspect of the mind responsible for discrimination, judgment, wisdom, and reasoning. It allows an individual to make decisions based on logic, reflection, and a deeper understanding of what is right and wrong. It is the faculty that distinguishes between truth and falsehood, permanence and impermanence, and helps in self-reflection and analysis.

Role: While Manas is involved in sensory processing and emotional responses, Buddhi is the higher intellect that can analyze situations, draw conclusions, and make thoughtful decisions. It is also the faculty that can transcend the ego (Ahamkara) through spiritual insight and self-realization. Buddhi is the seat of wisdom that allows an individual to pursue truth, morality, and spiritual growth.

Connection to Ahamkara: When functioning under the influence of Ahamkara, Buddhi can become distorted, as the ego influences its decision-making. Instead of making decisions based on wisdom and higher understanding, the ego often uses Buddhi to rationalize selfish desires and reinforce a false sense of self. However, when purified and free from egoic influence, Buddhi can lead to self-realization by discerning the true nature of the self (ātman).

3. Ahamkara (अहंकार) - Ego or "I-Maker"

Function: Ahamkara is the part of the mind that generates the sense of individuality or "I-ness" (ego). It is responsible for the identification of the self with the body, mind, thoughts, and emotions, and for creating the sense of separateness between the self and the external world. Essentially, Ahamkara forms the egoic sense of self that differentiates "me" from "others."

Role: Ahamkara gives rise to the idea of individuality and personal identity, which is essential for functioning in daily life but can also lead to attachment, desire, and suffering if not properly understood or transcended. In Indian philosophy, particularly in spiritual practices, the goal is often to transcend or dissolve Ahamkara to realize the true self (ātman), which is beyond individuality and is unified with the cosmic consciousness (Brahman).

Influence on Other Parts: Ahamkara colors the functions of Manas and Buddhi. It takes the sensory information processed by Manas and the decisions made by Buddhi, and identifies them as personal experiences—creating attachments and reinforcing the illusion of the separate self. For example, when you experience pleasure or pain, Ahamkara says, "This is happening to me," deepening the egoic attachment to transient experiences.

4. Chitta (चित्त) - Memory or Storehouse of Impressions

Function: Chitta refers to the storehouse of memories, impressions, and subconscious tendencies (called samskaras). It contains all the latent memories and impressions from past experiences, actions, and thoughts, which shape one's personality, desires, and inclinations. Chitta is sometimes viewed as a repository for both conscious and unconscious material that influences behavior and thought patterns.

Role: The impressions stored in Chitta can emerge in the form of thoughts, emotions, habits, or desires in response to external stimuli. It is deeply influential in determining the tendencies of an individual's mind and actions because past experiences, whether pleasant or unpleasant, leave traces that affect how the mind responds to similar situations in the future. Chitta plays a key role in the cycle of karma, as it holds onto the mental imprints of actions, which then influence future actions and outcomes.

Connection to Ahamkara: The memories and impressions stored in Chitta often reinforce the ego's sense of identity. When Ahamkara draws on past experiences from Chitta, it can become more entrenched in identifying with past successes, failures, relationships, or emotional states. These memories and impressions create attachments and aversions, reinforcing the ego's sense of separateness. In spiritual practices, purifying or clearing Chitta through meditation, ethical conduct, and self-inquiry can help transcend the egoic mind and lead to self-realization.

Summary of the Four Parts of the Mind in Relation to Ahamkara

Manas: Processes sensory input and creates thoughts and desires based on external experiences. Ahamkara identifies with these thoughts and desires, creating the egoic self.

Buddhi: The higher intellect that discerns truth and makes decisions. When influenced by Ahamkara, it rationalizes ego-based desires, but when purified, it can lead to spiritual insight and transcendence of the ego.

Ahamkara: The ego or "I-maker," which creates the sense of individuality and separateness from others and the universe. It plays a central role in reinforcing attachments, desires, and the illusion of a separate self.

Chitta: The storehouse of memories and impressions (samskaras) that shape the mind's tendencies. These past impressions feed into the Ahamkara, reinforcing the egoic identity and shaping future behavior.

Together, these four aspects of the mind create the full experience of consciousness, individuality, and perception in Indian philosophy. Spiritual practices such as meditation, self-inquiry, and yoga aim to purify and transcend these mental faculties, especially Ahamkara, to realize the true, non-dual self (ātman) that is one with the ultimate reality (Brahman).