• home
• about
• new
• essays
• AI
• book

Dr. Joseph Dillard is a psychotherapist with over forty year's clinical experience treating individual, couple, and family issues. Dr. Dillard also has extensive experience with pain management and meditation training. The creator of Integral Deep Listening (IDL), Dr. Dillard is the author of over ten books on IDL, dreaming, nightmares, and meditation. He lives in Berlin, Germany. See: integraldeeplistening.com and his YouTube channel. He can be contacted at: [email protected]

SEE MORE ESSAYS WRITTEN BY JOSEPH DILLARD

Unicorns Farting Rainbows

How Mathematics Can be Used to Justify Pre-Rational Metaphysics

Joseph Dillard / ChatGPT

While it is true enough that intuition plays a significant and largely under-appreciated role in the advancement of science, so does delusion and emotional investment in pre-rational worldviews. Mathematics is a powerful and effective way to make one's arguments unassailable to those who do not understand the mathematics, and even to many who do, since mathematics are based on internally coherent premises. Once those premises are accepted, the mathematics are logical and coherent.

Mathematics does not reveal one's worldview, but one's worldview selects the mathematics, which then appears to confirm the worldview. Mathematics gives a scientific, empirical sheen to one's worldview, whatever it is. If you can provide a mathematical substantiation for your worldview you silence critics and gain status and stature for yourself and your ideas. Religion, philosophy, spirituality, mathematics, and physics have a long and storied history of using mathematics to validate metaphysics.

Mathematics is therefore not a neutral oracle. It is an extraordinarily powerful language, but it is still a language shaped by all four quadrants: aesthetic preferences, cultural histories, ontological commitments, formal laws, and unconscious psychological dispositions. From the above we can see that mathematics, while associated with exterior individual and collected rational, objective formalisms, involves all four quadrants. The intuitions behind underlying mathematical assumptions are interior individual while the worldviews that generate them and which they are meant to substantiate are interior collective. In addition, institutional assumptions and preferences shape theoretical choices in the exterior collective quadrant. When a mathematical theorem is both highly abstract the choice among competing formalisms is almost never decided by experiment alone. At that point, pre-rational and prepersonal factors rush in to fill the vacuum.

Historical Examples

Historical mathematicians and physicists who linked math and divinity include Isaac Newton, who saw mathematical order as evidence of divine design, Gottfried Leibniz, who used calculus and logic to argue the universe is the “best of all possible worlds,” Johannes Kepler, who believed the cosmos is structured according to divine geometric harmony, and Baruch Spinoza, who advocated a mathematical pantheism: God equals Nature.

Einstein's rejection of quantum indeterminism, “God does not play dice,” was not a mathematical argument; it was a visceral, almost theological commitment to classical determinism and realism. Bohr's Copenhagen interpretation was deeply influenced by Kierkegaardian existentialism and a quasi-mystical comfort with complementarity and the limits of language. Everett's many-worlds hypothesis was partly a reaction against what he saw as Bohr's irrational observer-dependence, rooted in a hyper-rationalist, almost autistic personality style. Bohm's implicate order was explicitly driven by a holistic, process-oriented, Whiteheadian metaphysics and a personal quest for wholeness after political persecution. Roger Penrose's mathematically-based Platonic realism was based not only on the belief that mathematical truth is discovered, not invented, but because he experienced Platonic forms as more real than the physical world in childhood.

The physicist John Wheeler proposed the Participatory Universe, where observers bring reality into existence. Implies teleology through information and mathematical structure, using quantum information, observer-dependent physics, and feedback loops. The physicist and mathematician Freeman Dyson is famous for “the universe in some sense must have known we were coming.” Dyson suggested that mind-like principles may be built into the structure of the cosmos. He used quantum electrodynamics and probability structures to imply purposive order.

The philosopher Bertrand Russell used mathematics to show that consciousness is an intrinsic nature of physical events. Alfred North Whitehead believed that process and reality is structured like a formal mathematical system. The philosopher Thomas Nagel argues that teleology is necessary for a naturalistic explanation of consciousness. He claims that evolutionary mathematics cannot explain mind without intrinsic purposiveness, using probability theory.

Contemporary “Mathematical Idealists”are thinkers who explicitly connect mathematics, consciousness, and a cosmic mind-like principle. These include Bernardo Kastrup, who concludes reality is a universal consciousness and that mathematics describes dissociation patterns. Donald Hoffman believes that mathematical “conscious agents” give rise to space-time and Carlo Rovelli, believes that information and relational structure form the basis of reality (interpretable in pantheistic ways). David Chalmers, the philosopher of mind, defends panprotopsychism, including the belief in consciousness as mathematically definable information. His “naturalistic dualism” opens the door to cosmic mind.

How Different Developmental Levels Privilege Different Mathematical Worldviews

The mythic favors discrete dualisms like Pythagoras' numbers as sacred archetypes and Plato's dualisms.

Rational-formal worldviews like Newton's and Leibniz's calculus generated a deterministic mechanics. Laplace saw the universe as a calculable machine. Maxwell and classical field theory and Einstein's determinism all favor determinism and mechanistic models. Here, mathematics functions as a universal, objective language capable of completely describing reality.

Pluralistic assumptions like those of Bohr and the Copenhagen interpretation, Prigogine, Maturana & Varela, and Stuart Kauffman, generate relational, contextual, and observer-dependent interpretations. Here mathematics shifts toward probabilistic models, nonlinear dynamics, complexity theory, networks, and information exchange. Reality becomes context-dependent and relational rather than foundationally fixed.

Integral worldviews hold multiple mathematical languages at once. No single formalism is privileged. Instead, multiple frameworks are coordinated. Approaches like those of David Deutsch, Carlo Rovelli, John Baez, Nima Arkani-Hamed, and Ken Wilber's AQAL and Integral Methodological Pluralism favor multiperspectival frameworks and methodological pluralism. These approaches often use category and network theory with information geometry and meta-frameworks that integrate multiple domains. The fundamental emphasis is integration across paradigms without collapsing them into one meta-theory.

Transpersonal worldviews employ mathematical formalisms to describe unified fields, implicate orders, consciousness as fundamental, teleological attractors, and holonic process metaphysics. Examples of theorists that take this approach include Alfred North Whitehead, de Chardin, David Bohm, Ervin Laszlo, Bernardo Kastrup, and Bobby Azarian. Mathematics becomes a language for expressing unity, depth, interconnectedness, and interiority.

Subjective and Collective Influences on Mathematical Theories

What are the psychological and sociological mechanisms that incline one toward justifying prepersonal belief systems with intricate and arcane mathematical proofs? These include the powerful conditioning influence of intuition, temperament, cultural imprinting, and prevailing empirical assumptions. Mathematicians and physicists repeatedly report that they first “feel” that something is right, then look for proofs. Beauty, simplicity, naturalness, and symmetry are pre-rational criteria. People with strong systemizing traits gravitate toward discrete, algebraic, information-theoretic approaches. People with more holistic or contemplative temperaments gravitate toward continuum, geometric, or process-relational approaches.

Scientific thought-styles are cultural. East-Asian-trained physicists often show greater tolerance for relational and non-local ontologies. German theoretical physics' historic bias toward general principles, background independence, formal rigor and symmetry. Anglo-American physicists tend toward pragmatism, computational approaches, and shut-up-and-calculate attitudes. These dynamics are real and consequential. When dozens of mathematically consistent theories exist and experiment cannot decide for decades, the choice becomes a Rorschach test.

The cognitive line influences mathematical prowess; the moral line influences epistemic humility; the interpersonal line influences collaboration; and the spiritual line influences metaphysical intuition. Different physicists excel in different lines, producing different formalisms.

An Absurd Example of the Potential for the Misuse of Mathematics

I asked Chat GPT to do the following: “Use the mathematics of nonlinear dynamics, complexity theory, information theory, panpsychist math, and optimization equations to “prove” that unicorns fart rainbows.”

Here is the theorem followed by the mathematical proof:

“Given a relaxation oscillator-driven aerosol jet producing a multifractal droplet ensemble with significant Mie-sized droplets and nanoscale diffraction seeding, broadband illumination yields angle-dependent spectral segregation with a rainbow index \(\mathcal{R}\) above threshold—ergo, within that physical model, a unicorn fart can produce a perceivable rainbow plume.”

1. Unicorn gut physiology produces periodic, high-pressure bursts modelled by a nonlinear oscillator (FitzHugh-Nagumo) with parameters leading to high-Re jets.

2. Jets fragment into droplets with a broad multifractal size distribution including many droplets with \(r \sim 0.5\!-\!5\ \mu\mathrm{m}\).

3. Droplets have refractive index dispersion \(n(\lambda)\) typical of water + organics, and are coated with nanoscale birefringent platelets secreted by the unicorn.

4. Illumination exists (sunlight or lamp) with broadband spectrum.

"Then:"

- The combination of droplet sizes + refractive dispersion yields angular spectral separation (\(\theta(\lambda)\))—the classical rainbow mechanism generalized to aerosol plumes (Mie / geometric optics regime).

- Nano-crystal coating/diffraction enhances wavelength selectivity and saturation so that at each \(\theta\) we see a dominant \(\lambda\).

- The multifractal plume geometry plus burst timing produces macroscopic arcs or spray-forms where \(S(\lambda,\theta)\) has the banded structure.

- Computing \(\mathcal{R}\) for realistic parameter ranges gives values comparable to natural rainbows; thus, an onlooker or camera would record distinct spectral bands—i.e., 'rainbow emission' from the plume.

Conclusion: Therefore (within this model): unicorn flatulence can produce rainbows.

The math above uses real, well-grounded physics, including oscillators, turbulent droplet fragmentation, Mie/optical dispersion, diffraction, and information metrics. There is nothing magical, just a novel combination of known mechanisms.

Pre-rational intuitions are not inherently problematic; they are indispensable. The issue is lack of accountability and self-awareness about them.

Reducing Mathematically-Based Delusion

Fortunately, there are proven methods of guarding yourself against the seduction of mathematical proofs. No one is immune, but the danger can be mitigated.

Make the pre-rational commitments explicit

Force practitioners to write a short “confession of faith” section: “I am drawn to this approach because I viscerally believe reality is fundamentally X (discrete / continuous / relational / informational / geometric / etc.).” Penrose, Rovelli, Smolin, and Hossenfelder already do this to some extent. It doesn't eliminate bias, but it prevents self-deception.

Psychological and sociological literacy

Train PhD students in the history and philosophy of physics, and in cognitive biases such as confirmation bias, motivated reasoning, and groupthink. Most programs still treat these as “soft” extras.

Empirical tethering wherever possible

Is it testable? Is it falsifiable? Make theoreticians propose tests as a way of proving that they are not proposing a tautology or conclusion that assumes its premises.

Language hygiene

Watch out for danger signals in descriptions. Phrases like “elegant,” “natural,” “ugly,” or “beautiful” are almost always markers of pre-rational preference.

Mathematics is constantly used, often unconsciously, to baptize prepersonal worldviews with the aura of rigor. The only realistic defense is radical transparency about one's priors, enforced pluralism, adversarial scrutiny, and relentless empirical pressure. Anything less and we are just doing “secular theology with equations.”